My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1220_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1220_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:43:06 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 12:30:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
328
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the project. The guidelines address the overall character/level of quality, building materials and <br />fa�ade treatments, road network and character (including cross sections, paths, trails, etc.), <br />landscaping, trash collection, utilities, and other infrastructure, parks and green spaces, parking <br />lot layouts and landscaping, and coordinated signage. <br />10.4 In addition to these provisions the developer has outlined ways in which the project will <br />achieve many of the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards for <br />"Green" Building and site design. Refer to the attached memo from Rottlund Companies dated <br />September 28,2004. <br />1 _ �I �► �► = : �1111 ►1_ �► �/i :i •i • ii � • �� � - <br />'•�• i� �: � <br />. <br />1 l.1 In the mid 1980's, the City of Roseville adopted a long term policy (and retains it in the current <br />Comprehensive Plan) to remove trucking and industrial uses from the east side of 35W, in order <br />to create a more complementary neighbor to adjacent, northern and eastern residential areas. <br />This concept proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and policy. <br />I 1.� The City of Roseville (by policy) owns no land within the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area <br />and must rely on the market and private sector development companies and land owners to <br />reclaim and construct the new Twin Lakes neighborhood. The Community Development <br />Department has been directed to market the redevelopment of Twin Lakes. Staff has discussed <br />and promoted the Twin Lakes area to the maj ority of the top development companies in the <br />Twin Cities over the past 6-8 years. This proposal from the private sector (with over half the <br />land owned or controlled by the developers) is the most comprehensive and coordinated <br />redevelopmentproposed during that time. <br />11.3 Without a comprehensive and coordinated approach, the existing industrial zoning and uses <br />may remain or be slowly (and individually) redeveloped, making neighborhood wide <br />redevelopment impossible. The consistent response from the development community is that it <br />is very challenging (and a higher risk) to invest and redevelop higher quality uses (on a parcel <br />by parcel basis) adjacent to a blighted truck terminal. <br />11.4 The cost of creating or acquiring new industrial and truck terminal sites that meet all current <br />operational and regulatoryrequirements is more expensive than maintaining existing <br />"grandfathered" industrial sites. Therefore, the existing sites are valuable for trucking. <br />Converting them to office, retail, and housing uses requires significant more investment than <br />(despite their blighted appearance and despite the pollution generated there) building on a third <br />ring suburban vacant site. <br />11.5 Redevelopment of 80 blighted acres by removing partially vacant trucking and truck terminal <br />warehousing will improve the environmental and visual quality of the County Road C and <br />Cleveland entry to Roseville and will spur future redevelopment to the east and north. <br />11.6 Redevelopment will reduce trucking as an active land use within 80 acres and thereby will <br />reduce trucking activities on local streets. <br />PF3595_RCA_Twin_Lakes_General_Concept_122004 Page 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.