res_6887 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4 MR. HONCHELL: Not necessarily because while they call it a recycled asphalt pavement, in reality to make it economical to recycle a hot mix they have a major stock pile at the plant and the asphalt you may take off of your street gets added to that stock pile with the other asphalt the contractor has obtained from other projects and it's entirely conceivable the asphalt we take off our streets never gets back to our streets, and so all he's looking at is how many tons of material it takes him to get the asphalt itself. MAYOR DEMOS: Anyone else that wishes to speak pro or con? If not, I will close the hearing. COUNCILMAN ANDERSON then introduced the following resolu- tion and moved its adoption: Resolution No. 6887 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENT NO. P-78-9 UNDER AND PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 429 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, that in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chapter 429, as amended, the Council held a public hearing on the proposed construction of Improvement No. P-78-9 consisting of the installation of bituminous paving, concrete curb and gutter, and necessary appurtenances on Lydia Court from Lydia Avenue north to the end of cul-de-sac, as described in the Notice of Hearing at a cost presently estimated at $36,295.00, and substantially in accordance with the preliminary report as to the feasibility thereof which is now on file in the office of the City Manager; and having considered the views of all interested persons and being fully advised in the premises, the Council does hereby determine and order that said improvement shall be constructed and financed, and special assessments shall be levied therefor, pursuant to said Chapter 429, and that the area proposed to be assessed therefor shall include the property as described in the Notice of hearing. The City Public Works Director is directed to prepare and submit to the Council the final plans and specifica- tions. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilman Curley, and upon roll call vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: AlIi and the following voted against the same: None; where- upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.