Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville Human Rights Commission <br />Meeting Minutes – May 12, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />Member Grefenberg expressed concern that th e minutes reflect the actual language from the <br />Imagine Roseville 2025 report, and moved: <br />Page 5, Line 39, Additional language as follows : <br />“[Educate community members on the appreciation and contributions of diversity and <br />its issues, and provide means to repair damage caused by prejudice and exclusion ; <br />convey a clear message that diversity is a community asset and that intolerance is not <br />welcome in our community.]” <br />The Chair declared the motion failed due to lack of a second. <br /> <br />Member Grefenberg moved that language be inserted on Page 5, Line 36 as follows: <br />Page 5, Line 36, Additional language in parentheses immediately following the <br />reference to Lines 23 – 26 of the Imagine Roseville 2025 report : <br />“(Educate community members on the appreciation and contributions of diversity and <br />its issues, and provide means to repair damage caused by prejudice and exclusion ; <br />convey a clear message that diversity is a community asset and that intolerance is not <br />welcome in our community.)” <br />The Chair declared the motion failed due to lack of a second. <br /> <br />City Manager Malinen noted that Page 1, Line 14 should reflect that Chair Singleton, rather than <br />the City Manager administered the Oath of Office to new Commissione rs. Correction approved <br />by Member consensus. <br /> <br />Member Grefenberg requested clarification of th e process for making corrections to the minutes <br />prior to the meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Singleton said he would cove r that and review other protoc ols with City Manager Malinen <br />and advise members within the next two weeks. <br /> <br />Member Yates moved, seconded by Member Grefe nberg, to approve the meeting minutes of <br />April 14, 2009 as amended. Moti on carried: All ayes – 4/0. <br /> <br />Discussion about conducting anoth er Cultural Complementarity Forum <br />Chair Singleton had not yet receive d a return call from Ms. Loudi Rivamonte, with United Way <br />and part of the planning group for the last Forum, to arrange a meeting to discuss a process and <br />expectations, now that Ms. Loudi is no longer und er the auspices of the United Way and working <br />independently. Chair Singleton wants to clarif y several things before moving forward with <br />another forum. <br /> <br />Member Yates suggested a conversation with the United Way to clar ify their position and <br />Loudi’s role, to be respectful of their involvement and changes within the United Way. <br /> <br />Discussion included previous compensation to th e United Way of $300 for their facilitation and <br />involvement, and fee expectations for independe nt consultations; concerns about no longer <br />having the United Way as an umbrella organiza tion; what, if any, orga nization is behind the