My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0110
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0110
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2011 12:25:26 PM
Creation date
2/18/2011 12:25:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 10, 2011 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Community Development Director Trudgeon noted that the applicant was unable <br /> to attend tonight's meeting; confirming for Councilmembers that they were no- <br /> ticed of tonight's meeting. <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested that staff provide the applicant, in writing, the <br /> discussion and consequences of tonight's meeting. <br /> City Attorney Bartholdi advised that, subject to the 60-day review rule, the City <br /> Council should provide findings for the changes in fine and expiration for the IN- <br /> TERIM USE. <br /> Councilmember Willmus advised that those findings should be in accordance with <br /> those items mentioned by the Planning Commission and their recommendations. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned staff on the size of the remaining rubble <br /> pile. <br /> Community Development Director Trudgeon did not have a firm tonnage amount; <br /> however, he advised that upon staffs last review in June of 2010 the pile had <br /> been substantially larger, and estimated that approximately one-half of the rubble <br /> pile had been removed to-date. <br /> Councilmember Pust opined that the remaining pile remained very visible. <br /> Councilmember McGehee advised that she had received complaints regarding <br /> dust from the rubble pile; and questioned if the material was large component <br /> rubble, or if there was some dust, particularly during summer months with addi- <br /> tional wind. Councilmember McGehee questioned if the applicant could make an <br /> attempt to cover the pile to eliminate or reduce dust. <br /> Community Development Director Trudgeon noted that the material was Class 7 <br /> gravel, and probably had some dust; and advised that the applicant was motivated <br /> to get rid of the pile sooner than later. <br /> City Engineer Debra Bloom advised that the applicant could wet it down; with <br /> Councilmember McGehee seeking to amend the motion to require that the appli- <br /> cant wet the pile down. <br /> City Engineer Bloom clarified that the applicant was already under an existing <br /> erosion control condition on site; with the City requiring them to wet the pile <br /> down. Ms. Bloom advised that, if the City Council had additional concerns, they <br /> could include an additional condition in their motion; however, she noted that <br /> staff continued their weekly inspection of the site to ensure erosion control ordin- <br /> ance regulations were being met. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.