Laserfiche WebLink
■ <br /> Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 10,2011 <br /> Page 21 <br /> Roger Toogood, 601 Terrace Court; Owasso Hollow townhome Association <br /> Mr. Toogood expressed appreciation and compliments to Roseville City staff, and <br /> specifically Ms. Bloom. Mr. Toogood advised that he had attended every session <br /> and opined that Ms. Bloom did an excellent job of listening, asking the right ques- <br /> tions, and being open to all; and complimented her and the good information <br /> process. Mr. Toogood spoke in support of the sidewalk on the east side, consider- <br /> ing the number of seniors living on the east side, and their access to the park. Mr. <br /> Toogood opined that he'd rather see seniors crossing at Dale Street at an intersec- <br /> tion having some traffic controls. Mr. Toogood emphasized his strong support for <br /> the results of the process; and noted he was one of the louder voices to under- <br /> ground utilities, opining that this reconstruction project provided a unique oppor- <br /> tunity. While understanding the cost issues, Mr. Toogood remained in support of <br /> the undergrounding. <br /> Judd Whiting, 628 Terrace Drive—corner of Terrace and Dale Street <br /> Mr. Whiting thanked Ms. Bloom for the entire process; and opined that the pro- <br /> posed street construction was fabulous and would be a great change from current. <br /> While not supportive of having the pathway on his side of the street, Mr. Whiting <br /> spoke in support of it, while also recognizing the security and safety concerns ex- <br /> pressed by other speakers. <br /> Mr. Whiting spoke to undergrounding and questioned the luxury of having the en- <br /> tire City of Roseville pay for that privilege over and above the cost of this project, <br /> noting the existence of surcharges already on utility bills for one project. Mr. <br /> Whiting spoke in opposition to raising taxes or adding another surcharge to pay <br /> for something not necessary and having functioned well over his twenty-one years <br /> as a resident. <br /> Mr. Whiting spoke to speed, and agreed that there was an issue, and admitted he <br /> was also guilty of speeding in that area. However, he spoke in opposition to hav- <br /> ing to drive over speed tables in a residential neighborhood as a way to get drivers <br /> to obey the law, and expressed preference for having the street choked and addi- <br /> tional trees planted instead. <br /> Brad Skow, 635 Iona Lane <br /> Mr. Skow addressed the staff lifecycle cost analysis on pathway materials to con- <br /> sider concrete or asphalt, and questioned whether a similar analysis had been done <br /> for the road materials. <br /> Ms. Bloom responded that the City did not currently have a design perspective for <br /> concrete pavement, nor did they have much experience with concrete. Ms. Bloom <br /> reviewed the projected life span for pavement, based on periodic maintenance. <br /> Ms. Bloom noted that problems developed when contractors needed to access util- <br /> ities under the street, creating problems in those areas patched; and noted that <br /> concrete patches were significantly more cost prohibitive for residents, as well as <br />