2010-04-07_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, April 7, 2010 Page 3 they would continue to work with staff and the property owner on that actual 95 location. 96 Further discussion ensued on the wetland delineation, seasonal soil conditions, 97 and water table adjustments for seasonable norms to allow proper assessment. 98 Public Comment 99 Beverly Schmidt; 2442 Rice Street, Trailer #85, Little Canada (mobile home 100 park directly across Rice Street from the proposed tower site) 101 Ms. Schmidt had several questions related to impacts to residents of the mobile 102 home park related to signal interference with land and cell phone lines and 103 reception, as well as for any alarm systems; area traffic signal lights; or potential 104 lightning strikes; and any additional significant traffic from the location of this pole 105 at that site. Ms. Schmidt also questioned the allotment of revenue from this tower 106 lease, noting that there would be no public monies from the tower, but only 107 negative visual impacts. 108 Mr. Lloyd advised that FCC regulations dictated frequencies for users to operate 109 within a narrow frequency band to avoid interference with other frequencies and 110 users, including area signal lights; clarified that the tower was now proposed for 111 location on private property with that property owner the recipient of any lease 112 revenues; and advised that Mr. Fischer from Buell Consulting confirmed that the 113 equipment is outfitted to transmit any electricity from a lightning strike directly to 114 the ground. 115 Chair Doherty advised that minimal truck traffic would be realized, except during 116 the initial construction and for routine maintenance. 117 Gary Lumberg, Little Canada resident; owner of property at 170 Transit 118 Street; and father of property owner at 172 Transit (first house right off Rice 119 Street on Transit) 120 Mr. Lumberg expressed concern about this project, recognizing that people had a 121 right to build the towers; and questioned whether other locations in industrial 122 areas had been considered as a potential site rather than this one adjacent to a 123 residential neighborhood. Mr. Lumberg suggested that there may be a more 124 appropriate site in Little Canada in a more industrial area. Mr. Lumberg spoke in 125 opposition to locating the tower in the proposed location. 126 Chair Doherty noted that this particular tower request, at various locations, had 127 been before the Planning Commission and/or City Council in various alliterations 128 in the past months. 129 Commissioner Gisselquist concurred with Chair Doherty, and briefly reviewed the 130 original request for locating the tower in Acorn Park to facilitate a “dead zone” for 131 cellular and wireless signals in this area of the Roseville and Little Canada 132 communities; and that limited flexibility was available for other locations that 133 would effectively serve that area. 134 Members of the audience, off microphone, suggested other potential locations; 135 however, Chair Doherty advised that it was the Commission’s charge to review 136 the application and location currently before them. 137 Chair Doherty closed the Public Hearing at 7:20 p.m., with no one else appearing 138 for or against. 139 Chair Doherty spoke in support of the application; noting that this was the third 140 time a request had come before the Commission, due in part to suggestions from 141 the Commission and/or City Council for alternate locations outside of Acorn Park, 142 and acknowledging that the applicant had complied with that request. Chair 143 Doherty opined that any hazards to human health from these towers were 144 minimal or non-existent. 145