2010-04-07_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, April 7, 2010 Page 7 expressed concern in dictating design standards to architects their specific 299 design of a building’s base, middle and top. 300 Mr. Paschke advised that, in accordance with form based zoning, a hybrid was 301 suggested with performance not predicated on a map or diagrams. Mr. Paschke 302 opined that the goal of the proposed design standards should serve to create 303 more flexibility for creativity and varied aesthetics for building design. 304 Discussion ensued regarding parking in the rear of a commercial building and 305 practical applications while attempting to facilitate a pedestrian-friendly 306 environment (Page 7.e – parking placement); specific examples for 307 consideration; corner lots and frontage determined by the property address; and 308 practical problems in requiring that the front door face the street side rather than 309 the parking area. 310 Further discussion included realistic parking on interior lots versus corner lots. 311 Commissioner Gottfried, while recognizing that design functionality would be a 312 challenge and was a consideration, spoke in support of moving toward a more 313 pedestrian-friendly situation over the next twenty (20) years, especially for safety 314 concerns (i.e., Lexington Avenue without sidewalks); and expressed the need to 315 initiate this design now, with the Comprehensive Plan moving the City in that 316 direction, with consideration required on a case by case basis, recognizing that it 317 would not work in every situation. Commissioner Gottfried opined that today, 318 Roseville was a “pedestrian-hazardous” community and needed to move forward 319 through the transitional issues for long-term modification throughout the City. 320 Commissioner Boerigter questioned if that was what the Comprehensive Plan 321 actually envisioned, for most streets to have sidewalks; and questioned whether 322 this was what most citizens wanted to pay for or if it was politically expedient. 323 Commissioner Boerigter noted that Roseville was not downtown Minneapolis with 324 masses of people walking to different areas; but that it had larger lots, with things 325 spread out, and not many places accessible by walking; unless it was the intent 326 to create stronger density. 327 Commissioner Gottfried opined that there will be areas in Roseville where higher 328 density would naturally occur as the community redeveloped related to market 329 demands; but that it would take time; and that the Comprehensive Plan created a 330 foundation for moving forward long-term. 331 Commissioner Boerigter concurred that there were areas of Roseville that could 332 support that level of density. 333 Mr. Lloyd advised that, at a certain point, those using mass transit became 334 pedestrians, especially in nodes around those intersections, whether retail or 335 office uses, and that pedestrians prefer not to walk through parking areas but use 336 sidewalks; and noting that some people don’t have access to personal vehicles 337 and others may prefer to rely on other modes of transportation. 338 Commissioner Gottfried spoke in support of ensuring that various levels and 339 options for handicapped accessibility, specifically in higher density areas of 340 Roseville, are given full consideration to accommodate preferred growth in the 341 short and long term. 342 c. Annual Business Item – Election of 2010 Officers 343 Chair Doherty advised that he was willing to continue serving as Chair. 344 MOTION 345 Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Cook to approve 346 reappointment of Commissioner Doherty as Chair. 347 Ayes: 7 348 Nays: 0 349