2010-07-07_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, July 07, 2010 Page 10 Chair Doherty asked that staff would provide tonight’s discussion to the City 449 Council; with Mr. Paschke assuring the Commission that the City Council would 450 receive a copy of tonight’s meeting minutes. 451 At the request of Chair Doherty, Mr. Paschke advised that as a next step, the 452 City Council would discuss adoption of specific requirements for creation of a 453 regulating map and procedure, with that process coming back before the 454 Commission for consideration. 455 Chair Doherty and Commissioners were of a majority consensus that the City 456 Council be aware of the concerns related to the regulating map. 457 Mr. Paschke noted that, without the map, there could be no development; and 458 again assured the Commission’s that their comments and discussion from this 459 meeting would be directed to the City Council. 460 Recess 461 Chair Doherty briefly recessed the meeting at about 7:54 p.m. and reconvened at about 8:06 p.m. 462 b. PROJECT FILE 0017 463 Request by the Roseville Planning Division Adopting new regulations for 464 Title 10, Zoning Regulations, pertaining to the RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 465 Chair Doherty continued the Public Hearing for PROJECT FILE 0017 at 8:07 466 p.m. 467 City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly reviewed this request and recommended 468 approval of the proposed new text for all Residential Districts in the City of 469 Roseville, adopting new regulations for Title 10, Zoning Regulations, pertaining to 470 all RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, as detailed in the Request for Planning 471 Commission Action dated July 7, 2010. 472 Mr. Paschke noted that the proposed draft as periodically revised had been 473 available on the City’s website since February or March of 2010; and had been 474 heard at the Planning Commission on at least two (2) occasions to-date for 475 discussion and modification, with public comment. Mr. Paschke noted that staff 476 was advocating the proposed revisions based on a multitude of developments 477 post-1959 that were not in compliance with existing code creating a need for 478 variances; with related issues and problems, with related maps displayed at 479 previous open houses. 480 Mr. Paschke reviewed the major changes contained in Section 4, including 481 refinement defining and determining when and where to allow accessory 482 structures (1005.02) throughout the document, with a universal term yet to be 483 defined and still elusive; proposed design standards limiting the amount of 484 garage door emphasized on street frontage to enhance pedestrian environments; 485 design standards for multi-family structures; and a modification of dimensional 486 standards and setback areas. 487 Member Boerigter requested, and fellow Commissioners concurred, that future 488 drafts be provided in redlined format to allow comparison from one draft to 489 another for reference. 490 Mr. Paschke provided, as a bench handout, attached hereto and made a part 491 thereof, written comments from Member Wozniak specific to Residential Districts 492 (Chapter 1005). Mr. Paschke reviewed and provided staff responses for Member 493 Wozniak’s and members and staff discussed the merits of each to reach a 494 consensus. 495