2010-10-27_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Page 21 MPCA, and recommending that those professionals be used, with that recommendation 1009 supported by any attorney, unless the City chose to be more restrictive. Mr. Paschke 1010 advised that, for those items not having obvious standards, staff had debated the 1011 language and modified it to fit the needs of Roseville. 1012 Member Gottfried noted that, part of being transparent, was to clarify from where the 1013 standards had been obtained, to allow staff to be supported in their policy and the 1014 Planning Commission’s recommendation to the City Council. 1015 Mr. Paschke advised that these documents had been crated by a variety of City staff, 1016 even though he was presenting them, there had been significant input across all 1017 departments, including by the City Attorney. 1018 Member Gottfried spoke in support of staff giving further review to the written comments 1019 and points by Mr. Neprash, specifically those related to consistency and those items 1020 needing to be identified, and asked that staff further review those areas. 1021 Member Boerigter concurred; opining that he would like review existing Environmental 1022 Standards compared to those proposed in this new chapter; and asked that staff provide 1023 that comparison in the next meeting packet where those existing environmental 1024 standards were readily identifiable. 1025 Mr. Paschke noted that a comparison with current standards could not be done in similar 1026 format, given the wholesale reformatting and design of the proposed zoning code; but 1027 offered to provide a copy of the City’s current environmental standards for the nest 1028 meeting. 1029 Member Boerigter advised that this was satisfactory and would allow Commissioners to 1030 compare substance of both documents. Member Boerigter also requested that staff 1031 similarly provide current and proposed landscape plans as well. 1032 Mr. Paschke reiterated staff’s encouragement to Commissioners to provide their 1033 individual comments as soon as possible. 1034 Vice Chair Boerigter noted, for the public, that the public notice area discussion would be 1035 a separate or distinct process from this zoning rewrite, and would probably be coming 1036 before the Commission as a public hearing, along with other sections in 2011, and not 1037 currently incorporated in this initial rewrite process. 1038 8. Adjourn 1039 Vice Chair Boerigter adjourned the meeting at approximately 10:55 p.m. 1040