My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03704
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3700
>
pf_03704
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2011 8:37:56 AM
Creation date
2/23/2011 8:29:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3704
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2950 Long Lake Rd
Applicant
Berger Transfer
Date Final Variance Board Action
2/1/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to “hear requests <br />5.6 <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their <br />strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to <br />the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when <br />it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a <br />variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used <br />under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due <br />to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the <br />variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic <br />considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance....The board or governing body as <br />the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure <br />compliance and to protect”. <br />The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />5.3 <br />allowed by the official controls: <br /> In light of the conclusions one can reach on <br />“reasonable use” and normal business operations, the City Planning Staff has concluded <br />that a decrease in setback from 40 feet to 19 feet is a reasonable request. As a practical <br />matter, the generator will be screened by its own external metal casing as well as mature <br />The Staff has determined that the property can be put to a <br />conifers on the site. <br />reasonable use under the official controls if a 19 foot setback VARIANCE to Section <br />1007.01 is granted. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />5.4 <br />created by the landowner: <br /> The Berger property is one of a number of industrial uses to <br />a major electric overhead power entering the building from the street frontage. The <br />electric power to the building comes from a pre-existing overhead line and a building <br />service feed and transformer located on the front yard of the site, in the location where <br />The Staff has determined <br />the generator must also be set to allow for efficient back up. <br />that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and <br />an out-dated code, not created by the landowner. <br />The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />5.5 The <br />site is located in an industrial area, screened by existing large conifers. There are loading <br />docks and entries visible from the street. The generator will not degrade the character of <br />The Staff has determined that the 19 foot setback variance for the <br />these features. <br />generator will not alter the essential character of the locality, nor adversely affect <br />the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. <br />êòð ÍÌßÚÚ ÎÛÝÑÓÓÛÒÜßÌ×ÑÒæ <br />19 foot front yard setback VARIANCE to <br />6.1The Staff recommends approval of a <br />Section 1007.01 of the City Code (Industrial Building Front Yard Setback <br />Requirements) <br />to allow the installation of an emergency generator adjacent to Long <br />Lake Road based on the findings in Section 5 and the following conditions: <br />PF3704_RVBA_020106 Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.