My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0124
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0124
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2011 2:35:46 PM
Creation date
2/23/2011 2:35:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, January 24,2011 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Rep. Greiling advised that if the City of Roseville were to ask for a local option <br /> sales tax without having a huge property tax base, it would probably not be <br /> looked upon favorable; due to the large amount of commercial businesses, unless <br /> they could make a case that the City couldn't continue providing basic services in <br /> their operating budget. Rep. Greiling opined that, if that was the case, this would <br /> be the time to ask for that funding based on the current financial climate, even <br /> though it would be a difficult task to sell. Rep. Greiling noted that Rep. Scalze <br /> chaired the Suburban Caucus and there were things received by other cities and <br /> counties that suburbs never asked for; and there should be certain equity in the <br /> comparisons. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned how a local sales tax option compared in this <br /> economy to that several years ago when the regional OVAL facility was funded. <br /> Rep. Greiling noted that the bonding bill that included a hotel tax for the OVAL <br /> was a bipartisan bill that she had carried, but didn't quite make it on it's own until <br /> taken out of the bill and funds provided for maintenance of the building, which so <br /> far, had been continued. Rep. Greiling advised that, if the legislature did not want <br /> to put it in the bonding bill, a local sales tax could be another option. <br /> Senator Marty noted that a minimal local sales tax for Roseville as a hotel tax <br /> would most likely be approved. <br /> Acting Mayor Pust questioned the legislative delegation's involvement in transit <br /> and/or public transportation options, specifically how to get the NE Diagonal back <br /> on track with the Metropolitan Council. <br /> Rep. Scalze noted the difficulties in transit governance with so many different <br /> people and no one accountable for anything; and further noted past bills attempt- <br /> ing to disseminate some of the power of the Metropolitan Council so it was <br /> represented by elected officials, such as county commissioners, not just by ap- <br /> pointment by the Governor, with different sets of standards depending on which <br /> party was in power. Rep. Scalze advised that the Legislative Auditor had men- <br /> tioned that as a potential change to ensure accountability. <br /> Rep. Greiling discussed ridership in the west versus east metropolitan areas and <br /> density of both areas; and the need to blend transit options to make them fair for <br /> all areas. Rep. Greiling noted that the new Chair of the Metropolitan Council was <br /> a big champion for transit, and should prove a good advocate for our area. <br /> Acting Mayor Pust questioned where the legislative delegation would attempt to <br /> find the $6.2 billion to resolve the state deficit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.