Laserfiche WebLink
City of <br /> Eviu, r <br /> Minnesota,USA <br /> City Council Work Plan Meeting 1 <br /> Minutes <br /> City Hall Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br /> Monday, February 7, 2011 <br /> 1. Roll Call <br /> Mayor Roe called to order the Roseville City Council special meeting at approximately <br /> 6:00 p.m. and welcomed everyone. (Voting and Seating Order for January: Willmus; <br /> Johnson; McGehee; and Roe). Councilmember Pust had previously advised that she <br /> would be unable to attend tonight's meeting due to a family funeral in Montana; and had <br /> provided her written comments as part of the meeting agenda packet as well. <br /> Staff Present:Police Chief Rick Mathwig; Parks and Recreation Director Lonnie <br /> Brokke; Fire Chief Tim O'Neill; Finance Director Chris Miller; Public <br /> Works Director Duane Schwartz; Community Development Director Pa- <br /> trick Trudgeon; and City Manager Bill Malinen <br /> 2. Approve Agenda <br /> Mayor Roe reviewed the proposed format for tonight's meeting and the summary of City <br /> Council initiatives, along with their"Must Do" and "Ought to Do" suggestions and prior- <br /> ities allowing for freeform discussion. Mayor Roe suggested priorities be established for <br /> those items indicating a common theme by staff and/or City Councilmembers; with re- <br /> maining items without general consensus then being further discussed. <br /> Councilmember Willmus advised that he would like the opportunity to add a future meet- <br /> ing agenda item; and Mayor Roe suggested that Councilmember Initiated Future Agenda <br /> items be considered at the end of tonight's meeting. <br /> By consensus, the agenda was approved as presented. <br /> 3. Council Members—Initiatives and Suggestions <br /> a. Council Member Willmus <br /> Councilmember Willmus reviewed his written comments (Attachment 3.a), and <br /> expressed enthusiasm for the areas of agreement. <br /> Discussion among Councilmembers and staff included clarifying the authority of <br /> the HRA in relationship to the City Council, separate levy and bonding authority <br /> all under State Statute provisions; and distinctions between a proposed Park <br /> Board similar to the HRA and exploration and potential creation of a Parks Dis- <br />