CC_Minutes_2011_0207 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

DRAFT Special City Council Work Plan Meeting 1 Monday, February 7, 2011 Page 9 cies that may step in with enforcement actions; and the potential loss of eligibility for grant funds if not completed. Council consensus was in agreement with those items as written. Police Department"Must Do's" (Attachment 3.b from January 31, 2011 meeting) Council consensus was in agreement with those items as written. Parks and Recreation Department "Must Do's" (Attachment 3.c from January 31, 2011 meeting) Council consensus was in agreement with those items as written. Fire Department"Must Do's" (Attachment 3.d from January 31, 2011 meeting) Council consensus was in agreement with those items as written. Councilmember Johnson noted that the department's list worked itself into future CIP discussions. Finance Department "Must Do's" (Attachment 3.e from January 31, 2011 meet- ing) Council consensus was in agreement with those items as written. Councilmember Willmus questioned how to determine those items that were of high or low priority; with Mayor Roe and Councilmember Johnson suggesting that it would be defined as the budget process continued. Mayor Roe noted that the budget calendar was scheduled for discussion at the February 14, 2011 regular meeting, and further clarification should be part of that discussion. Community Development Department"Must Do's" (Attachment 3.f from January 31, 2011 meeting) The written staff comments were amended by consensus to revise language to "[Consider] Sub-Area Twin Lakes Regulating Map in accordance with City Zon- ing Code;" and to bring check marked item number four (4) from the "Ought to Do's" to the "Must Do" list, specifically to "Create a comprehensive economic development policy and mission to support existing businesses within Roseville and that also markets our community to attract new businesses." "Ought to Do's" Discussion included how the Department Heads defined those items on their lists: whether the "Ought to Do's" were just new ideas they'd like to pursue if they had extra time or those new policies and programs that could improve their depart- ment efficiencies.