Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 28, 2011 <br /> Page 16 <br /> e. Consider Awarding Bid for Janitorial Services for City Facilities <br /> Fleet and Facilities Supervisor Pat Dolan briefly summarized the requested award <br /> of bids as detailed in the RCA dated February 28, 2011. Mr. Dolan noted that <br /> seven (7) firms had submitted proposals, using the best value practice method, re- <br /> commending Linn Building Maintenance as their work plan met the various <br /> building needs and schedules for the City. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned whether the best value process evaluated <br /> contractors as employers, whether they offered full-time jobs with benefits. <br /> Mr. Dolan advised that the process did consider that, and that the wages were in- <br /> dustry-standard full-time positions at approximately$13 per hour with benefits. <br /> Willmus moved, Johnson seconded, award of the contract for janitorial services to <br /> Linn Building Maintenance in the amount of$260,313 for a three (3) year period <br /> effective in March 2011. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Johnson; McGehee; Willmus; Pust; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> f. Consider a Sales Tax Option <br /> City Manager Malinen reviewed this request as detailed in the RCA dated Febru- <br /> ary 28, 2011, and provided as a bench handout when inadvertently omitted from <br /> the meeting packet materials, attached hereto and made a part hereof Mr. Ma- <br /> linen clarified, following his most recent discussions with the League of Minneso- <br /> ta Cities (LMC), that a referendum would be held in a State General Election <br /> year; and that if the City Council proceeded with a referendum, it would be in the <br /> fall of 2012, with commencement in 2013, as outlined in the draft resolution. <br /> Councilmember Pust expressed her significant concerns about this, opining that <br /> the City Council had yet to discuss the possibility in any great detail, only in gen- <br /> eral terms. Councilmember Pust recognized the timing in meeting this legislative <br /> session; however, she spoke in support of additional community discussions on <br /> the possibility. Councilmember Pust agreed that the City needed to research and <br /> discuss additional revenue sources; but questioned why this approach rather than <br /> lobbying for removal of the levy cap and concentrate on property tax issues. <br /> Councilmember Pust expressed concern with the potential regressivity of a local <br /> option sales tax versus property taxes, and their specific impacts on Roseville tax- <br /> payers. Councilmember Pust questioned the possibility of Roseville succeeding <br /> in getting such a tax approved based on the unsuccessful history of other suburban <br /> communities in doing so. Councilmember Pust advised that she was not willing <br /> to say yes at this time without further discussion. <br />