My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0228
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2011 1:02:56 PM
Creation date
3/31/2011 1:02:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/28/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 28,2011 <br /> Page 18 <br /> frastructure and public safety services. However, Councilmember Pust noted the <br /> need for further analysis of the impact to Roseville citizens of such a local option <br /> sales tax and whether that was the best tax to raise. Councilmember Pust noted <br /> that the City did not have the authority, and she didn't anticipate the City receiv- <br /> ing that authority. Councilmember Pust clarified that the legislators were simply <br /> responding to a question of the City Council but did not suggest that the City pro- <br /> ceed, even though they expressed their willingness to carry the bill forward if the <br /> City proceeded. Based on the most recent statements by Governor Dayton, Coun- <br /> cilmember Pust questioned if the legislature needed another issue to defend this <br /> session. Councilmember Pust noted City Manager Malinen's recommendation to <br /> see if the issue was well received, and then proceed to finesse it; but she sug- <br /> gested that the question should be what did the City want to pay for and how to do <br /> so; and didn't need to be decided tonight and delay would allow time to ask more <br /> questions. <br /> Councilmember Johnson concurred. <br /> Mayor Roe shared some concerns in the process at this point; and Statute lan- <br /> guage related to the proposed resolution and how revenues were to be used. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that he was uncomfortable with the draft resolution and at- <br /> tached list of proposed uses for the sales tax; and expressed his preference for <br /> more discussion following the Park and Recreation Master Plan implementation <br /> process. <br /> Councilmember Johnson also noted the need to hear recommendations of the Fire <br /> Station Committee. <br /> Mayor Roe also noted the need to hear recommendations of the Finance/CIP Sub- <br /> committee. <br /> Councilmember McGehee advised that she had lived in other communities with a <br /> local option sales tax, and if you were a resident of that community or that county, <br /> you were exempt. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that the State of Minnesota's Statutes did not have such a provi- <br /> sion. <br /> Councilmember Pust concurred, noting that of those twenty (20) cities currently <br /> having a local sales tax, none had been exempted. <br /> City Manager Malinen reviewed the deadline of March 8, 2011 for submittal of <br /> bills for this session; and questioned any interest of the City Council as a body for <br /> any of those Parks and Recreation items listed, or for the estimated cost for new <br /> fire facilities; or if they had other suggestions of items having regional signific- <br /> ance in accordance with legislative policy and to provide direction to staff in pur- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.