Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 28, 2011 <br /> Page 25 <br /> Councilmember Johnson suggested a quick, simple exercise to determine where <br /> this type of budget would go: showing a zero budget; and a 10% differential in <br /> payroll to compensate for capital needs; and they both looked from staff's pers- <br /> pective and which programs and/or services would drop off. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that in order to do that the prioritization process needed to <br /> be done to inform that staff exercise. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned Finance Director Miller on the timing of in- <br /> formation from Ramsey County on tax capacity for the City; and the Auditor's <br /> Report. <br /> Finance Director Miller responded that typically preliminary aggregate estimates <br /> on tax capacity rates were received from Ramsey County in mid- to late-April; <br /> and the Auditor's Report typically by the end of March. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding when final numbers were available including legisla- <br /> tive actions; preference to have a target established by May; allowing time in the <br /> process for public input, tentatively scheduled in July,but allowing staff sufficient <br /> time to provide information for the public to comment on; the importance of nail- <br /> ing down the calendar now as a guiding document while allowing flexibility to <br /> tweak items through the process; and how staff should be directed to proceed and <br /> make recommendations. <br /> City Manager Malinen spoke in support of prioritization allowing staff to meet <br /> those targets, however they're set; and working from the bottom up on those <br /> priority listings. City Manager Malinen advised that this step was really impor- <br /> tant, noting that the City Council had two (2) new Councilmembers not having <br /> previously weighed in on the current priority list, but noting that staff was seeking <br /> collective rankings to adjust priorities. <br /> Councilmember Johnson suggested that staff use last year's priorities for their ex- <br /> ercise on a zero or 10% reduced/increased levy to show what impacts would re- <br /> sult. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed his concern with the ranking methodology <br /> and categorizations uses. However, Councilmember Willmus advised that he <br /> didn't have a strong feeling on which budget process was used; and that he would <br /> gauge where he thought spending was too high or too low, no matter if a priority- <br /> based or line item budget was used. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that the methodology used could be a discussion item. <br />