My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7042
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:23 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:04:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7042
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. UL-80-13 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
10/13/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />bond issue because of the shortness of the assessment period. <br />If the people want it assessed in one year we can assess it <br />in one year, and if they want it in more than one year, that's a <br />matter to be presented. Whether or not you come to a con- <br />clusion on that aspect would be determined at the time of the assess- <br />ment hearing, but you may wish to get some input on that tonight. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Are there any written statements? <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: There are none. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I ask that each speaker identify him or herself <br />and, as Mr. Popovich said, you might want to address the subject <br />of whether it should be done in one year or more. Anyone to <br />address this subject? <br /> <br />MRS. BETTY LINK: I took the proposal around and we just felt <br />it was for the safety of ourselves. Just one assessment was <br />proposed at the time we were running around with the proposal so <br />I think they understand it's going to be one assessment. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Anyone else that wishes to speak on this subject? <br />Anyone else that wishes to speak to this? If not, I will close <br />the hearing. <br /> <br />COUNCJLMAN CURLEY then introduced the following resolu- <br />tion and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />ReSoltition No. 7042 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION <br />OF IMPROVEMENT NO. UL-80-l3 <br />UNDER AND PURSUANT TO <br />MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 429 <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville, <br />Minnesota, that in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota <br />Statutes 1961, Chapter 429, as amended, the Council held a <br />public hearing on the proposed construction of Improvement No. <br />UL-80-13 consisting of the installation of ornamental street <br />lights in the general area of Mount Ridge Road between County <br />Road D and 150 feet south of Brenner Avenue as described in the <br />Notice of Hearing at a cost presently estimated at $2,946.24, and <br />substantially in accordance with the preliminary report as to the <br />feasibility thereof which is now on file in the office of the City <br />Manager; and having considered the views of all interested persons <br />and being fully advised in the premises, the Council does hereby <br />determine and order that said improvement shall be constructed <br />and financed, and special assessments shall be levied therefor, <br />pursuant to said Chapter 429, and that the area proposed to be assessed <br />therefor shall include the property as described in the Notice of <br />Hearing. The City Public Works Director is directed to prepare <br />and submit to the Council the final plans and specifications. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.