res_9255 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF :MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE * * * * * * * * * * * * * Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly called held at the City Hall on Tuesday, the 5th day of December, 1995 at 5:30 P.M. The following members were present: P. Johnson, Mastel, Goedeke, Wiski, V. Johnson and the following were absent: None. Member P. Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 9255 RESOLUTION APPROVING SCOTT GRESETH/WELSH COMPANIES REQUEST FOR AN AMEND:MENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND THE NUMBER OF GAMING DEVICES AT LAVA LINKS, 1665 W. COUNTY ROAD B-2 WHEREAS, said regulations provide that amusement centers may be allowed within the confines of a SC Shopping Center zoning district as a conditional use; and WHEREAS, approval of an amendment to an existing conditional use permit for an amusement center in the Crossroads Shopping Center at 1665 W. County Road B-2 has been requested by Lava Links to add 14 amusement devices (for a total of 50); and WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission recommended approval of such amendment to an existing conditional use permit subject to certain conditions on November 8, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council conducted a public hearing on the requested amendment to the conditional use permit on December 5, 1995. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Roseville, Minnesota (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, that an amendment to an existing conditional use permit for an amusement center within a SC Shopping Center zoning district be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval be subject to the floor plan and operation/security plan presented to the City Council on December 13, 1993. 2. The total number of amusement devices shall be limited to 50 or less (November 27, 1995). The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Mastel and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: P. Johnson, Mastel, Goedeke, Wi ski, and V. Johnson and the following voted against the same: None.