Laserfiche WebLink
1 Member Von De Linde moved, Member Eckman seconded scheduling a Special Meeting of the <br />2 GLWMO on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. at the Roseville City Hall, in a room <br />3 to be determined if the Hawthorne Room was unavailable, for the single purpose of interviewing <br />4 the firm of FOR for development of the Third Generation 509 Plan. <br />5 <br />6 Ayes: 5 <br />7 Nays: 0 <br />8 Motion carried. <br />9 <br />10 After further deliberation, Chair Ferrington moved, Member Manzara seconded scheduling a <br />11 Special Meeting to address final 2010 business items of the GLWMO on Tuesday, November 30, <br />12 2010 at 5:30 p.m., at a location yet to be determined as room reservations are finalized. <br />13 <br />14 Ayes: 5 <br />15 Nays: 0 <br />16 Motion carried. <br />17 <br />18 Coordinate next steps for input /discussion /selection with Shoreview and Roseville <br />19 Mr. Maloney and Mr. Schwartz agreed to submit their questions for consideration of the Board <br />20 prior to the interview of EOR. <br />21 <br />22 Mr. Maloney opined that, from his perspective, the two finalist firms had been generally <br />23 responsive to the Board's RFP, exclusive of stylistic differences as he previously noted. Mr. <br />24 Maloney suggested that if the Board could be firm about the expectations of the firm(s) and their <br />25 expectations of city staff for supporting documentation, local plans, data, and maps, to the <br />26 greatest extent that could be articulated by the firm, it would be of great assistance for staff in <br />27 providing that information in a timely way. Mr. Maloney advised that his main question for the <br />28 EOR proposal was to clearly understand each respective city's role in development and <br />29 implementation of the plan. <br />30 <br />31 Mr. Schwartz asked that the firm(s) be asked to clarify goals, policies and regulatory <br />32 expectations of watershed districts for the cities, noting that in Roseville, preference was given to <br />33 see some level of consistency for storm water management, volume and infiltration across <br />34 watershed districts, further noting that they were part of the Capitol Region WD and Rice Creek <br />35 WD. <br />36 <br />37 Chair Ferrington confirmed that with two watershed districts and the GLWMO have <br />38 responsibility for portions of Roseville, and with one watershed district and GLWMO in <br />39 Shoreview, such consistency was definitely an important component. <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 New Business <br />43 <br />44 Review/Payment of Invoices <br />45 Mr. Peterson revised the invoice list for tonight's meeting by removing Item 4 identified as <br />46 Administrative Services for RCD from July 1, 2010 to October 22, 2010; and advised that he was <br />