Laserfiche WebLink
596 Review and Discuss Items Identified in 2001 Plan and Previous Board Discussions AND <br />597 GLWMO Vision and Mission for the Next Ten (10) Years <br />598 At the request of Ms. Correll, discussion was held on the success and/or results of the "report <br />599 card" process as a framework to measure performance of the Second Generation Plan and lack of <br />600 evidence of their continued use to -date; recognition that the 2001 Plan pre -dated when cities fell <br />601 under MS4 and NDPES regulations negating the need for a review mechanism for cities; current <br />602 process for city inventories and reporting of water quality making the report card process <br />603 redundant, while creating a lack of awareness for the public in the cost of implementing MS4 <br />604 requirements other than the mandated annual published report; and inclusion in the Third <br />605 Generation Plan of how MS4 regulations informed measurable action items with the annual <br />606 report showing trends in meeting those goals. <br />607 <br />608 Mr. Maloney suggested that the GLWMO Board should have some mechanism in place <br />609 recognizing the annual reports by member cities. <br />610 <br />611 Further discussion included incorporation of city summary information with data needed by the <br />612 GLWMO; how the report information could be used in the GLWMO's educational components <br />613 for stormwater practices, in conjunction with city requirements in meeting the MS4 goals for <br />614 education and outreach; specifically addressing wetland resources in the Plan; minimum <br />615 protection standards consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA); <br />616 identifying standards for implementation by the GLWMO for future evaluation of more stringent <br />617 standards; and identification of local government units (LGU's). <br />618 <br />619 Additional discussion included pending status of the Ramsey County Groundwater Protection <br />620 Plan in providing consistency for the GLWMO to address stormwater runoff; identification of <br />621 former dump sites in the GLWMO area; guidance for cities with vulnerable areas, specifically <br />622 wellhead protection and drinking water supply areas; an inventory of wellhead protection areas <br />623 recently completed by RCD staff; mechanisms in place to identify unused wells at property <br />624 points of sale; how to become more aware of or stay alert of evolving groundwater issues in the <br />625 metropolitan area as a whole that area bigger in scope and scale than just the area served by the <br />626 GLWMO; emerging pollutants in surface water; results of the recent USGS Study conducted on <br />627 Lake Owasso; pending completion by the City of Shoreview on Phase I of their Wellhead <br />628 Protection Plan; and recognizing the difference in member cities with the City of Shoreview <br />629 having its own wells and the City of Roseville purchasing water through the Saint Paul Regional <br />630 Water Utility Service. <br />631 <br />632 Discussion ensued related to future Board discussions if the Ramsey County Groundwater <br />633 Protection Plan was approved, and subsequent mandates on cities and WMO's incorporating <br />634 mandated policies for other LGU's and what legal authority a WMO had as a permitting agency; <br />635 and the need once a new Plan is in place for cities to become in compliance with their <br />636 Comprehensive Water Management Plan. <br />637 <br />638 Mr. Maloney noted that the City of Roseville had to make their local plan comply with three (3) <br />639 different entities: Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), Capitol Region Watershed District <br />640 (CRWD) and GLWMO. <br />641 <br />14 <br />