My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7073
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7073
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:37 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7073
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. ST-P-80-21 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/17/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />The existing roadway is 26 to 28 feet wide. It's very flat in <br />some locations (inaudible) which is part of the problem in the <br />condition of the roadway in that the water does not run well to <br />the low spot at the intersection. The roadway is essentially <br />in the centerline and it's proposed that it be constructed again <br />in the center of the right-of-way and the City standard and <br />which those of you who have been with us all night, if you <br />will bear with me, is 32 feet wide, face to face with straight face <br />curbs on the edge to carry the storm drainage, and asphalt paving <br />with aggregate base. . <br /> <br />Pascal is of essentially the same design and configuration. <br />As part of the improvement it is proposed to build storm drainage <br />approximately 60%, two-thirds of the way up the road so the water <br />can be intercepted before it goes the entire length, another set <br />of basins here and a third set to pick the water up that comes <br />through the back yards before it gets on to the roadway. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: The total published cost was $141,829. Of that <br />$121,454 is for the street, curb and gutter, and $30,376 for the <br />storm drainage. Based on the assessable front footage of 2,805 <br />feet the total cost would come to $43,29 a foot, and at 25% of that <br />it's $9.52 a foot for the paving. <br /> <br />On the storm drainage there are 45 lots involved so at 100% <br />it would be $675.02. At the 25% rule it would be $168.76 per <br />lot. It is recommended that this be assessed over a period not <br />to exceed 15 years, and our assessment hearing would be next year, <br />after the improvement is in. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Any written statements? <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: We have one letter in favor of the project and <br />two in opposition. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I will open the hearing and ask that you state <br />your name and address, and the address of the property you're <br />referring to. <br /> <br />MR. ROBERT SCHMIDT, 1428 West Burke: Could you please tell <br />us how long a normal street, once it's built, with normal <br />maintenance, how long that should last? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: If you're referring to the type of street as <br />part of this construction, it's assumed to have a 20-year design <br />life, at which time it would have to have an overlay. <br /> <br />MR. SCHMIDT: Could you tell us the percentage difference in <br />the maintenance cost for a new street versus an old street, and <br />how long it would take us, or if we could ever recoup that invest- <br />ment. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: NO, I do not have the specific number. <br /> <br />MR. SCHMIDT: Ball park figure? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.