My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7074
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7000
>
res_7074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:13:38 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:05:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7074
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-80-27 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/17/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4 <br /> <br />lived with because of the availability of other parking. <br />This would be (inaudible), and by raising the street would make <br />it match bet ter with the existing lots. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: I will give you the assessment figures by <br />each improvement. Taking Belmont Lane including Pascal, the <br />total cost is $122,380, and some 70% of the people petitioned <br />for it. The storm sewer portion is $22,055, and the street, <br />curb and gutter of Belmont with Pascal would be $l16,2l3. <br />If it's totally assessed it would be $42.04 a front foot. Based <br />on the 25% rule it's $lO.5l. The storm sewer portion would <br />be added. At 100% it would be $711.47 a unit. At 25% it <br />would be $l77. <br /> <br />The Eldridge improvement was 58% petitioned for. The total <br />cost is $128,232. The estimated cost per foot would be $48.05 <br />and at the 25% rate, $l2.0l a foot. Since these streets are <br />close to each other they make a natural for consolidation. The <br />consolidated figures would have a total cost, including Eldridge, <br />Belmont and Pascal, of $228,558. Estimated cost per foot is <br />$45.55. At the 25% rate it's $ll.39. <br /> <br />Again, this would be spread over the period not to exceed <br />15 years, with the assessment hearing this fall, and the <br />interest rate would be determined at that time depending on our <br />bond sale and what interest rate we received there. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Any written statements? <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: We have two letters, one opposed from l424 <br />West Eldridge, and one in favor of the project at l44l West <br />Eldridge. <br /> <br />l1AYOR DEMOS: I will open the hearing to the public, and ask <br />that you come to the microphone and speak for or against the <br />development. <br /> <br />MR. ROBERT WUSSLER, 1433 Belmont Lane: I'm the petitioner <br />on Belmont Lane. I just have one question about the storm sewer <br />part. There were going to be catch basins in the middle of the <br />block, but the problem - the drainage problem is right off of <br />Hamline. It's just practically flat there and that's where the <br />water stands, unless you're going to grade the street in a <br />different way. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: We can do some minor regrading (inaudible). <br />One of the gentlemen came up and expressed the same problem <br />during the recent (inaudible). Until Hamline has its improve- <br />ment by itself by the County and we are able to locate (inaudible). <br />There is drainage on Hamline but we can't put catch basins in <br />everyone of the low spots. We need to have curb and gutter so <br />it doesn't flow off the side of Hamline (inaudible). Until the <br />roadway is done on Hamline - we may be able to help it some. <br />I wouldn't tell you we can solve (inaudible). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.