Laserfiche WebLink
504 GLWMO involvement in discussions/negotiations of the Lake Wabasso weir, as well as <br />505 similar projects throughout its history. <br />506 <br />507 Members concurred that this history would benefit the general public and should be included as <br />508 part of the educational opportunities discussed in 2011. <br />509 <br />510 Member Eckman noted that Mr. Schwartz had advised that there were archived historical <br />511 GLWMO records stored at the Roseville City Hall, <br />512 <br />513 Mr. Maloney advised that the City of Shoreview also had archived historical GLWMO records at <br />514 the Shoreview City Hall, occurring when the two cities interchanged administration of the <br />515 WMO. <br />516 <br />517 Ms. Bloom concurred, noting that both cities had retained records during their respective <br />518 administration of the WMO. <br />519 <br />520 Member Eckman advised that those records needed to be sorted and the historical timeline <br />521 revised accordingly, with members recognizing the massive undertaking involved in that <br />522 process. <br />523 <br />524 Chair Ferrington clarified, and Mr. Maloney concurred, the critical need for the Board to <br />525 differentiate and define the legal terminology for "services" contracted with individuals to <br />526 provide a product versus "support" indicating matching or in -kind contributions. Chair <br />527 Ferrington advised that the historical timeline needed to reflect that differentiation as well. <br />528 <br />529 Mr. Maloney further clarified the intent to differentiate between vendor relationships versus <br />530 partner relationships, or vendors versus technical support. Mr. Maloney noted that, technically <br />531 when cities administered the WMO, they billed the GLWMO for those services to be transparent <br />532 to the public the allotted services provided specific to the city's administration duties of the <br />533 WMO. <br />534 <br />535 While Members concurred that additional detail for the historical timeline was needed, <br />536 maintaining and revising it would be much easier to accomplish by Member Eckman. <br />537 <br />538 Member Manzara thanked Member Eckman for this benchmark work, opining that what had <br />539 been accomplished to -date was priceless, and allowed for addition of significant events in the <br />540 future as they occurred, with linkages to appropriate surveys and referencing other data. <br />541 <br />542 2001 Watershed Management Plan <br />543 Chair Ferrington led discussions on how the Second Generation Plan had served the GLWMO <br />544 and enabled initiation of actions to address area concerns and develop a more stringent plan than <br />545 required by the state, indicting the WMO's proactive interest in water quality issues. <br />546 <br />547 Mr. Maloney noted that, with the GLWMO water body classification system, the City of <br />548 Shoreview adopted that system when doing their Water Management Plan; cautioning that, if the <br />12 <br />