Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 09,2011 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Mr. Kelly was unsure of similar concerns; and recognized that the development <br /> was a significant improvement from the former Har Mar Apartments; but reite- <br /> rated his concern about the tree removal. <br /> Councilmember Johnson questioned if Mr. Kelly had addressed his concerns to <br /> Sienna Green management. <br /> Mr. Kelly advised that Sienna Green representatives used the excuse that the trees <br /> were removed in error; and he was unaware of their intent to remove them until <br /> they came down. Mr. Kelly noted that some smaller trees had been planted to re- <br /> place the larger trees. <br /> Mayor Roe closed the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that there were several actions related to Sienna Green on to- <br /> night's meeting agenda. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned, and Mr. Paschke clarified, that there were <br /> forty-eight (48) underground parking spaces proposed in the next phase of the <br /> project. <br /> James Lenhoff,AEON Representative <br /> Mr. Lenhoff advised that the trees on Phase I of the project had been removed in <br /> error by their general contractor; but AEON had since worked with the Rosewood <br /> Village Association Board for a mutually-agreed upon and beneficial landscaping <br /> plan; with some plantings already initiated and more to be done once Phase II of <br /> the project is completed. Mr. Lenhoff noted that the trees removed were Cotton- <br /> wood trees; and that an additional 25-30 trees of various species were proposed to <br /> be added to that site. Mr. Lenhoff noted that the trees on the triangle and south of <br /> it that were proposed to be removed were also Cottonwood; and advised that <br /> AEON representatives were working more closely with the contractor to ensure <br /> only those trees proposed for removal were removed and the others would remain. <br /> Related to parking, Mr. Lenhoff advised that fifty (50) new spaces were proposed <br /> with Phase II for additional parking options; and recognized that some residents <br /> did park on the street, which was permitted on both sides of the street at this time. <br /> Mr. Lenhoff referenced a parking study done with Phase I; noting that a number <br /> of residents didn't have vehicles, but anticipated more vehicles needing parking <br /> with Phase II. As part of past PUD negotiations and approvals, Mr. Lenhoff <br /> noted that AEON had provided proof of parking for an additional seventeen (17) <br /> spaces if a need was indicated. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned the location of that parking. <br />