My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0708_ET_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Ethics Commission
>
Minutes
>
2002_0708_ET_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 7:30:06 AM
Creation date
5/27/2011 9:19:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Ethics Commission <br />Minutes <br />Meeting of July 8, 2002 <br /> <br /> <br />Members Present: Chairman Mark Battis, Amy Ihlan, Richard Langseth and Thomas Ring <br />Members Absent: Robert Kippley (excused, schedule conflict) <br /> <br />Member Introductions: Chair Battis introduced himself and the other members introduced themselves. <br /> <br />Review and Approval of Tonight’s Agenda: Chair Battis reviewed the agenda. <br /> <br />Consider an Ethics Complaint Filed by Lillian Chiarella Against Mayor John Kysylyczyn, dated June 25, 2002: <br /> <br />Battis reviewed several procedural matters. Specifically, he reviewed compliance with the procedures set forth in paragraph IV. B of the Roseville Ethics Procedures: <br /> <br />this meeting was being held within 14 calendar days of receipt of the complaint, <br />the ethics complaint dealt with a “public official,” the Mayor; <br />the ethics complaint is signed, <br />it states the Complainant believes the complaint to be true and it is not filed for frivolous reasons. <br /> <br />As for the question of whether the behavior described in the complaint would if true be a violation of Roseville’s Ethics Code, Battis indicated that in fairness to the Respondent he <br />believes that determination should not be made at this time. <br /> <br />Then, with respect to procedural issues, Tom Ring stated he was recusing himself from this matter. Ring explained that his office, the Ramsey County Attorney’s Office, had reviewed <br />a request seeking the filing of criminal felony charges against the Mayor for the same conduct described in the ethics complaint. Inasmuch as Ring had participated in a meeting at his <br />Office discussing the filing of criminal charges relating to this conduct, he and the members of his Office believe it is best that he not participate in an ethics review of this matter. <br /> Battis indicated he might ask Ring and the Ramsey County Attorney’s Office to reconsider recusal if the Complainant and Respondent both agree that Ring could participate despite his <br />Office’s criminal review of this matter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.