My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-02-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-02-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2011 11:12:06 AM
Creation date
5/27/2011 11:11:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/22/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair DeBenedet suggested that, prior to proceeding with a focus group as <br />previously discussed by Members, more defined information was needed on how <br />that group would operate. <br />Member Vanderwall noted that the only people showing up at PWET <br />Commission meetings were haulers, and suggested a separate hauler focus group <br />from a user focus group; to ensure that the full story was heard from all parties, <br />not a vocal minority. <br />Chair DeBenedet reviewed topics for the March meeting, including: <br />Traffic management policy <br />Undergrounding ordinance <br />Coal Tar Ban ordinance <br />Erosion Control (time- sensitive) <br />Organized Waste Update with Joel Hansen <br />Chair DeBenedet asked that when staff could arrange this meeting with Mr. <br />Hansen, that both he and Mr. Pratt attend to allow a in ore comprehensive <br />discussion on the same evening. Chair DeBenedet also suggested that staff <br />make specific outreach to a representative of the Roseville Concerned Citizens <br />(RCL) and the League of Women Voters (LWV). <br />Public Comment <br />Michael Bay, Ace Solid Waste <br />As a refuse hauler, Mr. Bay reviewed his perspective of some of the pros and cons <br />from his experience with other cities undertaking this same study for organized <br />collection. Mr. Bay suggested that this topic came forward whenever there was <br />an economic downturn or when City government budgets were tightened and <br />citizens were looking for someone to blame. Mr. Bay opined that garbage trucks <br />were not the cause of road wear and tear, but that other local truck traffic was also <br />to blame, with the main culprit in MN being that of the extreme temperature <br />variations. Mr. Bay further opined that as a vendor his company worked in a free <br />market society and the competition was good for residents and provided them <br />with a choice, rather than relying on involvement from local government. Mr. <br />Bay addressed how recycling participation grew based on the ease of that service; <br />how larger national vendors could outbid local companies; and how local haulers <br />made connections and provided special services to individual residents. From his <br />perspective, Mr. Bay suggested that the government stay out of the trash hauling <br />business. <br />Doug Carnival, St. Paul Attorney for National Solid Waste Management <br />Association <br />Mr. Carnival echoed comments of the previous speaker; opining that competition <br />was the best way to go; noting that in the 18 -20 communities where this issue had <br />come forward, citizens had clearly expressed their preference to choose their own <br />waste hauler, and that the choice should continue to be citizen driven versus city <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.