Laserfiche WebLink
budget, Mr. Lambert questioned if such a low priority item as trash collection <br />should be taken on by local government at this time. <br />Discussion among Members, Mr. Lambert, and staff included challenges in <br />setting up an RFP for selecting and contracting with a selected hauler; guarantees <br />to ensure a minimum number of customers; willingness of haulers in lowering <br />price to compete in order to shift their existing customers over to a city controlled <br />contract; and logistics in establishing a collection system. <br />9. Coal Tar Ban Ordinance <br />Randy Neprash, former PWET Commission Member and professional in the field, <br />provided two (2) bench handouts, attached hereto and made a part hereof," related <br />to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's) and Coal- tar -based Seal coating <br />materials on water bodies in urban areas. <br />Randy Neprash, 1276 Eldridge Avenue <br />Mr. Neprash presented a brief slide show on additional scientific findings related <br />to these materials. <br />Chair DeBenedet advised that he had recently contacted engineering staff in the <br />City of Maplewood, which City had recently enacted a ban on these materials, as <br />well as a ban enacted by the City of White Bear Lake. Chair DeBenedet noted the <br />incentive in doing so included the need for cities to comply with fairly new <br />MPCA regulations for stormwater clean up; and the expense of dredging out and <br />disposing of hazardous waste. Chair DeBenedet advised that the City of <br />Maplewood staff found that most retail outlets no longer sold coal tar -based <br />products; providing further rationale for proposing such an ordinance for <br />Roseville. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that, in 2010, there had been an effort at the state legislature <br />to enact a state -wide ban on coal- tar -based sealants, which had ultimately failed. <br />Mr. Schwartz further advised, that while it was anticipated that such legislation <br />may be taken up again during the 2011 session, it had not yet happened; with <br />local the local legislative body stating that it was past time to introduce that type <br />of legislation during this session; providing the option to pursue local bans. Mr. <br />Schwartz noted additional information in tonight's meeting packet from previous <br />PWET Commission discussions; and staff revisions from the undiluted language <br />of the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) model ordinance previous presented, <br />and revisions made similar to those ordinances adopted by the Cities of White <br />Bear Lake and Maplewood for a total ban. Mr. Schwartz noted that the City <br />Attorney had drafted this ordinance in Roseville format, potentially banning coal <br />tar -based sealants for use in the City. Mr. Schwartz sought comment and <br />discussion of Members on the revised ordinance. <br />Chair DeBenedet suggested including references of the goal/policy statements <br />from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Section 8, to the Ordinance's Purpose <br />Page 16 of 18 <br />