res_9273 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

County Road B-2 Service Road, west cul-de-sac to Hamline East Snelling Service Road, Snelling Curve north 200' Snelling Curve, East Snelling Service Road to cul-de-sac Simpson Street, Transit Avenue to Snelling Curve Pascal Street, Transit Avenue to Rose Place Holton Street, Sextant Avenue to Brooks Avenue ST-96-08. Neighborhood 28 Storm sewer on Snelling Curve P-96-06. Neighborhood 24 Rose Place, Walnut Street to cul-de-sac 2. The Public Works Director was also directed to include in the report the estimated cost of the proposed improvements and as to whether such improvements should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement. The preliminary report and cost estimates have been submitted and considered by the Council and are hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Manager. The improvements proposed to be made in the general manner set forth in the report are designated as Improvements P-96-02, Neighborhoods 14, 16,28, 37; ST-96-08, Neighborhood 28, and P-96-06, Neighborhood 24. 3. The Council shall meet at the City Hall, 2660 Civic Center Drive, in said City, on February 12, 1996, at 7:30 p.rn. for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed improvements under and pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place, and purpose of that meeting to be published twice in the official newspaper, Roseville Review, which publications shall be a week apart, and the second publication shall be not less than three days before the date of the hearing. 4. The notice shall be in substantially the following form: (see attachments). 5. The general nature, estimated cost and area proposed to be assessed for Improvements P-96-02, Neighborhoods 14, 16,28, 37; ST-96-08, Neighborhood 28, and P-96-06, Neighborhood 24. is determined to be as stated in the foregoing notice, as fully as though the same were separately set forth and resolved herein. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilperson Mastel and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mastel, Maschka, Goedeke, Wiski, and Wall and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.