My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9274
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9200
>
res_9274
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:37:26 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 9:02:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9274
Resolution Title
Tower Place area amendment to the Roseville Comprehensive Plan revising the text and providing additional land use map designations for the existing plan adopted in 1994 (1/22/96).
Resolution Date Passed
1/22/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />internal traffic flows. (This may be an eligible cost if such a development occurs and requests <br />the use of TIF.) <br /> <br />3) The current office building property owners do not support (and, at this time, do not find the <br />need for) the establishment of parking ramps on Prior Avenue as was proposed at one of the <br />study meetings. <br /> <br />4) Concern over James Addition residential parcels. <br /> <br />5) Page 8 regarding TIF should be rewritten to state subdivisions may require 10%. <br /> <br />6) City and business will continue to review... and collaborate on... <br /> <br />7) Need master plan precept. <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED, the City ofRoseville City Council hereby approves and adopts the 1996 <br />Tower Place Area amendments to the City ofRoseville Comprehensive Guide Plan, subject to review <br />and comments of the plan by the Metropolitan Council, <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City and businesses within the Tower Place Study <br />Area will continue to review and collaborate 0 new projects and trends, and <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager and/or Community Development <br />Director are hereby directed to submit the Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Wiski and <br />upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof; Mastel, Maschka, Goedeke, <br />Wiski, Wall and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA) <br /> <br />) SS <br /> <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) <br /> <br />I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City ofRoseville, County of Ramsey, <br />State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing <br />extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 22nd day of January, 1996, <br />with the original thereof on file in my office. <br /> <br />WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 22nd day of January, 1996. <br /> <br /> <br />SEAL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.