res_9274 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

internal traffic flows. (This may be an eligible cost if such a development occurs and requests the use of TIF.) 3) The current office building property owners do not support (and, at this time, do not find the need for) the establishment of parking ramps on Prior Avenue as was proposed at one of the study meetings. 4) Concern over James Addition residential parcels. 5) Page 8 regarding TIF should be rewritten to state subdivisions may require 10%. 6) City and business will continue to review... and collaborate on... 7) Need master plan precept. BE IT RESOLVED, the City ofRoseville City Council hereby approves and adopts the 1996 Tower Place Area amendments to the City ofRoseville Comprehensive Guide Plan, subject to review and comments of the plan by the Metropolitan Council, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City and businesses within the Tower Place Study Area will continue to review and collaborate 0 new projects and trends, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager and/or Community Development Director are hereby directed to submit the Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Wiski and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof; Mastel, Maschka, Goedeke, Wiski, Wall and the following voted against the same: None. WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City ofRoseville, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 22nd day of January, 1996, with the original thereof on file in my office. WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 22nd day of January, 1996. SEAL