My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7228
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7200
>
res_7228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:14:36 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:09:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7228
Resolution Title
Amending Assessments for Improvement No. UL-80-12
Resolution Date Passed
8/24/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />; <br />. <br /> <br />Name and Address <br /> <br />1, <br /> <br />Eugene M. & Karen M. <br />Bahnemann <br />2656 Lexington Ave. <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />William L. & Jean M. <br />Quesnel <br />2654 Lexington Ave. <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />George Reiling <br />661 Heinel Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />Description <br />of Property <br /> <br />Unplatted Lands <br />N 80 Ft of S 266 Ft of <br />W 660 Ft of SW 1/4 <br />(Subj to Drs) in Sec. <br />2, T. 29, R. 23 <br /> <br />Change Made <br />Original Revised <br /> <br />$20.45 <br /> <br />$0.00 <br /> <br />79-00200-020-67 <br /> <br />Unplatted Lands <br />N 100 Ft of S 186 Ft <br />of W 660 Ft of SW 1/4 <br />(Subj to Esmts) in Sec. <br />2, T. 29, R. 23 <br /> <br />$20.45 ' $0.00 <br /> <br />79-00200-010-68 <br /> <br />Unplatted Lands <br />S 86 Ft of W 660 Ft <br />of SW 1/4 (Subj to Rds) <br />in Sec. 2, T. 29, R. 23 <br /> <br />$20.45 <br /> <br />$0.00 <br /> <br />79-00200-030-68 <br /> <br />2. It is hereby found and determined by this Council that <br />the foregoing amendments are just and equitable to said proposed <br />assessment, and necessary to a fair assessment for payment of the <br />cost of said improvement. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was <br /> <br />duly seconded by Councilman Johnson, and upon vote being taken <br /> <br />thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: All; and the <br /> <br />following voted against the same: None; whereupon said resolu- <br /> <br />tion was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />/" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.