Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 23,2011 <br /> Page 20 <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that most hardware stores and big box retailers had stopped <br /> selling the coal tar-based products, and those asphalt-based products were not <br /> demonstrating issues similar to coal tar-based products; noting that coal tar-based <br /> products were still available to vendors going door-to-door selling driveway seal <br /> coating services. <br /> Mr. Neprash advised that independent vendors could easily move from coal tar- <br /> based to asphalt-based applications, using their same equipment, with minimal <br /> and basically one-time cleaning and retrofitting of their equipment. <br /> Councilmember Johnson questioned how, if the City adopted this philosophy to <br /> no longer allow this product, how would it be policed and enforced without major <br /> cost to the City. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that would be a problem, with no resources available to pa- <br /> trol neighborhoods and take samples. Mr. Schwartz suggested that education was <br /> the City's best tool at this time to alert people to the City's ban on these types of <br /> product and their rationale for that ban to address water quality issues. Mr. <br /> Schwartz expressed hope that homeowners would ask questions of independent <br /> vendors and get documentation from them stating their products were not coal tar- <br /> based and therefore legal for use in Roseville. <br /> Councilmember Johnson questioned if the products would then be illegal for sale <br /> in Roseville. <br /> Mr. Neprash assured Councilmembers that Roseville was not the only City to <br /> adopt such an ordinance; and as more cities adopted such legislation, it would be- <br /> come wider known and standard practice among vendors. <br /> Councilmember Pust questioned if existing coal tar-based coatings should be re- <br /> moved before applying an asphalt-based coating. Councilmember Pust ques- <br /> tioned the connection between the dust coming off the coal tar-based coating into <br /> the home and exposure to children; and whether even if you never seal coated a <br /> driveway again, would that dust exposure continue. <br /> Mr. Neprash advised that he had not heard such a recommendation for removal <br /> from his various sources. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that these products had a relatively short life cycle: 2-4 <br /> years. <br /> Councilmember Pust moved, and Councilmember Johnson seconded adoption of <br /> an ordinance banning coal tar-based products. <br />