My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-06-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-06-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2011 9:08:16 AM
Creation date
6/28/2011 8:53:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/28/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Stenlund suggested that the City Council also be made aware of the <br />PWET Commission's appreciation of Roseville staff who have taken their time to <br />share their time and expertise with the Commission as well as the community at <br />large. Member Stenlund further suggested that the City Council and PWET <br />Commission have a dialogue on the PWET Commission's future role. Member <br />Stenlund recommended that the City Council be made aware of the erosion of <br />some of the City's parks, such as the Frisbee Golf Course; and how to integrate <br />community projects and pathways. Member Stenlund suggested that the City <br />Council alert the PWET Commission of any "hot topics" of which they were <br />aware in the near future that may come under the Commission's review for <br />recommendation. <br />At the suggestion of Member Gjerdingen in further consideration of how utility <br />undergrounding could be addressed with street reconstruction in the future, Mr. <br />Schwartz advised that there had been consideration of developing a policy for <br />utility undergrounding; however, staff had been unable to allot time to move that <br />forward at this time, opining that the Traffic Management Policy was a higher <br />priority given several current and pending situations. <br />Related to that Traffic Management Policy, Ms. Bloom noted receipt by the City <br />Council at their last meeting of a petition to close a street; the pending request for <br />speed calming methods on Dale Street; and the need for a consistent policy to <br />address various situations, as well as assigning associated costs as applicable. <br />Ms. Bloom noted that the traffic counts on Josephine Road had just been <br />completed earlier that evening. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that the PWET Commission comments had been <br />incorporated into the Tree Preservation Ordinance, presented to the City Council <br />at their meeting last night, and returned to staff for further review following City <br />Council comment at that meeting. <br />Chair DeBenedet asked that Mr. Schwartz prepare an outline of the items <br />discussed for the joint meeting and circulate it to individual Commissioners prior <br />to the meeting. <br />Member Vanderwall suggested that, given the multitude of topics, time be <br />reserved for due diligence and sufficient discussion time at the joint meeting. <br />Chair DeBenedet noted the need to keep the review and report of past initiatives <br />and recommendations as brief as possible to allow for that discussion time, and to <br />avoid losing the interest of Council members and any questions they may have. <br />Member Vanderwall suggested that the majority of the information be provided in <br />writing, with verbal highlighting of those items of focus. <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.