My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-05-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-05-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 9:55:56 AM
Creation date
6/30/2011 9:55:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/24/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bloom reviewed individual Commissioner comments that had been <br /> incorporated and how to interpret the relined version based on that feedback; and <br /> noted that the fees would be included with other City fines and fees that were <br /> reviewed annually for any amendments based on actual costs and staff time. <br /> Ms. Bloom noted that this was the first step, followed by the Storm water <br /> Drainage Ordinance in the near future, with an Illicit Discharge Ordinance and <br /> other related ordinances to follow. Ms. Bloom further noted that non-compliance, <br /> implementation and maintenance issues would be addressed upon receipt of best <br /> management practices (BMP) information pending from the Ramsey <br /> Conservation District. <br /> Member Stenlund arrived at this time, approximately 7:03 p.m. <br /> Discussion included identifying and differentiating construction versus post <br /> construction control provisions in place for failure to comply and their <br /> consistency and/or overlap with other sections and areas of administrative <br /> enforcement; whether those costs could be assessed if reimbursement was not <br /> received; and ability to enforce action if failure to do corrective work. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that the sections mentioned would be further reviewed by <br /> staff and a clean copy would be presented to the City Attorney for review and <br /> comment. Members expressed their interest in receiving a clean copy of the <br /> document when available. <br /> Member Vanderwall moved, Member Gjerdingen seconded, recommendation to <br /> the City Council of the Erosion Control Ordinance as presented; pending final <br /> review by staff and the City Attorney. <br /> Ayes: 5 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 6. Discussion of Joint City Council/PWET Commission Meeting Topics <br /> Mr. Schwartz led Members in a review of topics discussed in 2010, and potential <br /> 2011 topics for discussion with the City Council at the annual joint meeting with <br /> the PWET Commission, scheduled for Monday, June 13, 2011; as detailed in the <br /> staff report dated May 24, 2011. Mr. Schwartz noted that, in addition to those <br /> items, the PWET Commission's review and recommendation of a Neighborhood <br /> Traffic Management Policy would be a large undertaking over the next few <br /> months. <br /> Member Felice noted she had a scheduling conflict and would be unavailable to <br /> attend the joint meeting. <br /> Page 4 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.