Laserfiche WebLink
Chair DeBenedet opined that the timeliest discussion should be the organized <br /> trash collection issue. <br /> Member Vanderwall opined that the City Council not be given conclusions, since <br /> there are many different opinions within the community and the City Council was <br /> not privy to the background research and information compiled by the PWET <br /> Commission's due diligence to-date. <br /> 7. Traffic Management Policy <br /> Chair DeBenedet noted the sample Policies provided by staff as part of the agenda <br /> from the cities of Blaine, MN, Evanston, IL, and Des Plaines, IL. <br /> Member Felice noted another policy from the City of Kent, WA that she had <br /> liked, specifically their rating chart assigning points for various components. <br /> While noting that such a ranking process would create more work for staff, <br /> Member Vanderwall noted that such a rating chart would provide a good way to <br /> evaluate a project and get direct participation from a wider group of stakeholders, <br /> as well as creating more support. <br /> Member Vanderwall noted staff s previous comment on three requests for such an <br /> evaluation already pending; and questioned whether part of the question for <br /> Public Works was whether that was part of the value for consideration in a <br /> ranking process. <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted the increasing number of requests being fielded for additional <br /> enforcement, traffic calming measures, and other traffic management concerns. <br /> Ms. Bloom opined that, if a policy was in place, the City would field even more <br /> requests, since the typical staff response for those requests now is that there are <br /> insufficient funds to implement such measures unless a street reconstruction was <br /> being done. <br /> Discussion ensued on how and when the point system would be used; whether <br /> extra points would be applied if construction was planned or in progress; whether <br /> traffic calming measures are a good investment and safe, or whether they are <br /> bicycle-friendly and would not force them into traffic; benefits of vertical <br /> elements and their effectiveness in slowing traffic; snow plowing and <br /> maintenance issues; advantages of signage; advantages and disadvantages of <br /> things to consider during the analysis process, as facilitated by diagrams of actual <br /> use; and how ranking would be influenced by the origination of the request. <br /> Further discussion included rationale for developing such a policy and the <br /> perceptions of how involved government should be or not be; other needs that <br /> would serve the public good but can't be accomplished due to a lack of funding <br /> and how such a policy ranked in the overall priority scheme; residential versus <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br />