My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7299
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7200
>
res_7299
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:15:15 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:10:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7299
Resolution Title
The City of Roseville is Opposed to Proposals Currently Before the LCER to Abolish the Public Employment Relations Board, and to Request the Roseville Legislative Delegation and the Legislative Commission on Employee Relations to Vote Against Such P
Resolution Date Passed
1/25/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />OF ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA - HELD JANUARY 25, 1982 <br /> <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City <br />Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall <br />in said City on Monday, January 25, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Franke, Kehr, Curley, Johnson and Demos. <br /> <br />and the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />Member Kehr <br /> <br />introduced and moved the adoption of the following resolution: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 7299 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Legislative Commission on Employee Relations (LCER) is con- <br />sidering a proposal to abolish the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) <br />and its functions be assigned to the Bureau of Mediation (BMS), and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the basis of said proposal is that two administrative agencies are <br />unnecessary and cumbersome; a combined agency would provide more efficient <br />administration, District Court provides an adequate appeal process from the <br />Bureau of Mediation, and such changes would implicitly result in cost savings <br />to the City, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Rosevi 11 e beli eves the PERB to be a useful and <br />acceptable part of the appellate procedure, as evidenced from the high per- <br />centage of cases resolved at the Board 1 evel, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville believes the appeal process through the <br />District Courts would involve an extended period of time and not resolve <br />critical bargaining unit issues in a timely manner, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville believes the PERB function, as an appellate <br />Board, is a substantially less costly process than District Court, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville beli eves the PERB is a function which demands <br />a highly specialized area of expertise, and the decisions of such Board are more <br />likely to be consistent in interpreting the Public Employment Labor Relations Act. <br /> <br />THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City or Rosevi11 e is opposed to proposals <br />currently before the LCER to abolish the Public Employment Relations Board, and <br />to request the Roseville legislative delegation and the Legislative Commission on <br />Employee Relations to vote against such proposals. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.