My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0620
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2011 12:44:30 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 12:44:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/20/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 20, 2011 <br /> Page 17 <br /> Commissioner David Holt opined that validation of the Master Plan had occurred <br /> through the survey; and noted that the purpose of the Master Plan was for its in- <br /> tended completion in entirety over a twenty (20) year cycle; and while the com- <br /> munity center came up as a high priority item over and over again during the <br /> Master Plan process, there was no indication of how to pay for it or how it was <br /> going to look. Commissioner Holt opined that the charge to the Commission was <br /> for a development of a future community center, but no firm determination on <br /> how it was going to happen. <br /> Commissioner Ristow noted how the City's Public Works Department partnered <br /> with other communities for equipment sharing and other options; and opined that <br /> a future community center may be another opportunity for such a partnership. <br /> Commissioner Ristow asked that the sacrifices made over the past many years by <br /> the Parks and Recreation Department be recognized by the City Council and that <br /> those funds now be made up and entrust the Commission to make use of them in <br /> the best possible way to benefit the community. <br /> Councilmember Pust, looking to the Commission as community leaders, asked <br /> that when coming forward with their proposals, they include as much detail as <br /> possible based on their work to-date and informed decision-making done by the <br /> Commission and community. Councilmember Pust noted the importance for that <br /> detailed information and recommendation, based on ongoing CIP discussions of <br /> the City's long-term and previously-deferred needs; potential increases in utility <br /> fees, potential fire station referendum and school district referendums, as well as <br /> impacts to municipalities from state actions or inactions. Councilmember Pust <br /> noted that the City Council would be looking at that overall picture as they made <br /> their decisions; and noted that the more the Commission could lay out in detail the <br /> proposals over that twenty (20) year period and based on their expertise and intel- <br /> ligence, the more seriously the City Council consider it balanced with other <br /> things. <br /> Mayor Roe noted one aspect of the survey results based on demographics, is that <br /> those community demographics would also change over the next twenty (20) <br /> years, and the philosophical question of who the community was most trying to <br /> attract. Also, addressing the CIP, Mayor Roe assured the Commission that all <br /> along, the CIP Subcommittee had looked at the park and recreation needs as part <br /> of the whole picture, as they considered the community-wide picture; and had <br /> been intentional in awaiting survey results before giving serious consideration to <br /> finalizing that CIP study, with recommendations to-date based on best informa- <br /> tion available, and picking low-hanging fruit. <br /> Councilmember Pust concurred, noting that it was understood all along that this <br /> process was going on at the same time as the CIP study. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.