CC_Minutes_2011_0620 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 20, 2011 Page 5 decisions on service levels could be based on best practice budgeting for results, both short and long-term, and whether to retain the status quo or do better. Further highlights included specific facilities visited or used, many dependent on whether the household had children, or was specifically targeted to individual needs and/or interests, and included the skating center, City Hall/civic center meeting rooms, HANC; with 79% of respondents having used some facility over the last twelve (12) months. The overall rating of those facilities' physical condi- tions (or most visited/used) indicated excellent at 40%, good at 57%, and fair at 3%. The second part of the presentation included the level of support of respondents for the "community vision" for the future of the City's Parks and Recreation sys- tem, indicating the following: • Community vision has been captured through the planning process to-date; • Maintenance of the current system is of high importance; • A high percentage of households would use indoor facilities; • A high percentage of households would support acquisition of open space and parkland; and • A majority of households with children would support improvements of sports facilities. Mr. Vine noted that, throughout the survey, 15-23% of respondents were satisfied with the status quo and chose "none" as their typical response. The "top three" priorities indicated from the survey results indicated that over 50% of the households would "vote in favor" or support the following: mainten- ance of existing trails and sidewalks; additional walking and biking trails in exist- ing parks; and additional sidewalks along streets. Mr. Vine advised that through- out all sectors, the most important and least controversial improvement supported by households and their support for funding with tax dollars was improved walk- ing and biking trails. The "top two" priorities indicated acquisition of properties that preserve local open spaces; and acquisition of properties adjacent to existing parks. Related to indoor programming spaces, over 80% of responding households indi- cated that they would use at least one indoor programming space if available (walking and jogging track); however, Mr. Vine noted that there were many dif- ferences in preferred indoor water use features (e.g. leisure pool; lanes for lap swimming; warm water for therapeutic purposes). Options to fund the costs for operating a new indoor multi-purpose community center indicated that 68% of respondent households feel costs should be paid through user fees and taxes, with fees supported by a majority of respondents.