Laserfiche WebLink
<br />roadway. Drainage occurs generally from north to south and is <br />picked up in an existing pair of catch basins at the intersection <br />of Terrace Drive and Merrill Street. The drainage facilities <br />are adequate and there is no proposal to modify them appreci- <br />ably. The driveways and boulevard areas on each side of the <br />street are generally moderate in grade and, as you can see from <br />the overhead, there are existing trees on either side of the <br />roadway along the full length of Merrill Street. <br /> <br />The proposed construction is for a City standard, seven <br />ton, residential street with concrete curbs on both sides of the <br />roadway and with a new asphalt surface. Typically, a residen- <br />tial street in Roseville is a 32 foot wide street from face of <br />curb to face of curb. As you saw in the previous slide, there <br />are numerous trees along both sides of ~his roadway so it is <br />proposed, in that case, to reduce the roadway width from the <br />standard 32 feet to 29 feet. The second action proposed is to <br />move the alignment of the roadway slightly to the west, starting <br />about mid-block of the street and going to the north. We feel <br />those two actions will increase the distance from the construc- <br />tion to the existing trees and we feel confident that none of <br />these trees will have to be removed as a result of the construc- <br />tion. <br /> <br />The roadway grades along the road would generally match <br />those of the roadway which are there today. The major differ- <br />ence is that there will be quite a bit more pronounced cross- <br />slope or crown in the road and there will be more consistent <br />longitudinal grades draining toward the drainage structures in <br />Terrace Drive. Building a 29 foot roadway instead of the 32 <br />foot Roseville standard width roadway will require, on one side <br />of the ro~dway, to have parking prohibited on it. The staff <br />really doesn't have a preference - one side of the roadway or <br />the other - but we might suggest that it might make some sense <br />to prohibit the parking on the east side since this is the side <br />of the road that has mailboxes, which are there today, and <br />prohibiting parking will encourage freer mail delivery. <br /> <br />Before Mr. Popovich gives a few of the specifics on the <br />proposed assessments for this improvement, I might take a <br />moment at this time to explain how the assessments for corner <br />lots are calculated. A typical rectangular interior lot, like <br />most of these along this street - the determination of assess- <br />able footage is really quite simple. It's simply the width of <br />the frontage on these lots which abuts the roadway. A corner <br />lot is a little more difficult in that the assessable footage <br />depends both on the geometry of the lot and, obviously, which <br />roadway is under construction. For the purposes of an example, <br />I'll talk about this lot on the corner of Terrace Drive and <br />Merrill Street. Every corner lot has a front and a side and <br />for assessment purposes the front of a lot is simply defined <br />as the shorter of those two sides. It doesn't matter which <br />direction your house faces, it doesn't matter onto which street <br />your driveway exits, it doesn't matter on which street your <br /> <br />2 <br />