res_7356 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Extract of Minutes of Meeting of City Council City of Roseville Ramsey County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council of tne City of Roseville met in regular session at the City Hall on Monday, the 24th day of May, 1982, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Mayor Demos and Councilmen Curley, Franke, Kehr and Johnson; and the following were absent: None. Councilman Kehr introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution No. 7356 RESOLUTION RBCEIVING REPORT Al~D PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON I~WROVEl1ENT NO. P-82-7 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows: 1. By resolution adopted March 22, 1982, the Council has directed the City Public Works Director to prepare a prelimi- nary report as to the feasibility of a proposed improvement including all that property on Millwood Avenue from Hamline Avenue to Pascal Street, by the installation of bituminous paving, concrete curb and gutter and necessary appurtenances. The Public Works Director was also directed to include in the report the estimated cost of the proposed improvement and as to whether such improvement should best be made as proposed or in connection witil some other improvement. The preliminary report and cost estimate have been submitted and considered by the Council and are hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Manager. The improvement proposed to be made in the general manner set forth in the report is designated as Improvement No. P-82-7. 2. The Council shall meet at the City Hall, 2660 Civic Center Drive, in said City, on June 14, 1982, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the pro- posed improvement under and pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of that meeting to be published twice in the official newspaper, Roseville Sun, which publications shall be a week apart, and the second publication shall be not less than three days before the date of the hearing. 3. The notice shall be in substantially the following form: