My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7359
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7300
>
res_7359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:16:14 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:12:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7359
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-7 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor
Resolution Date Passed
6/14/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MAYOR DEMOS: Are there any written statements? <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: There are none. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: At this time I will open the hearing to the <br />public and ask t~at each speaker come to the microphone, give <br />his or her name and the address of the property to which they're <br />referring. <br /> <br />MRS. BECKY KRAMER, 1413 Millwood: Does anybody have a copy <br />of the petition that has the wording on it? I remember the <br />petition going around but I don't remember the exact wording on <br />it. (Mr. Popovich showed her a copy.) Okay, that answers one <br />question. The second question I had - the reason, I understand, <br />that the petition originally came up was because after the <br />storm sewer was put in, the street was not sufficiently resur- <br />faced. I'm wondering why it was not completed at that time, and <br />had. it been done, perhaps the petition would not have been neces- <br />sary. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: When you say "sufficiently resurfaced", do <br />you mean the entire width or why a curb and gutter wasn't put on? <br /> <br />MRS. KRAMER: Just the entire width. Just one half of the <br />street had new tar put on it. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: The reason for that is because that's the <br />extent of the street that was dug up for the storm sewer work <br />and, therefore, new pavement was put down where the old pavement <br />was torn out. The purpose of the storm sewer improvement was <br />not necessarily to build a new street - it was to put in drain- <br />age facilities. Therefore, the entire street wasn't repaved <br />because it wasn't affected. <br /> <br />MRS. KRAMER: It just seemed like a half-finished job to me. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I'd like to say that when all of our utilities <br />have gone in, that's been the way that they've been done. In <br />fact, you will find. that the different utilities went on differ- <br />ent sides of the street. For instance, sewer went on one side <br />and water went on another and that as each went in, that half <br />was the only one done. That's been the pattern throughout the <br />City as long as I can remember. Anyone else on Millwood Avenue? <br />I guess I'm a little surprised that there's no more response <br />when it's costing that much. Is there anyone else that wishes <br />to speak on Millwood Avenue? If not, I'll close the hearing. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON then introduced the following resolution <br />and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.