Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Street on the west, Highway 35-W on the east, State Trunk Highway <br />36 on the south, and a line 400 feet more or less south of Terminal <br />Road on the north, as described in the Notice of Hearing at a cost <br />presently estimated at $120,000.00, and substantially in accor- <br />dance with the preliminary report as to the feasibility thereof <br />which is now on file in the office of the City Manager; and <br />having considered the views of all interested persons and being <br />fully advised in the premises, the Council does hereby determine <br />and order that said improvement shall be constructed and financed, <br />and special assessments shall be levied therefor, pursuant to said <br />Chapter 429, and that the area proposed to be assessed therefor <br />shall include the property as described in the Notice of Hearing. <br />The City Public Works Director is directed to prepare and submit <br />to the Council the final plans and specifications. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was <br /> <br />duly seconded by Councilman Johnson and upon roll call vote being <br /> <br />taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: All; and <br /> <br />the following voted against the same: None; whereupon said <br /> <br />resolution was 0eclared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN ~OHNSON: We have for many years - and I was <br />on the Planning Commission where we talked for years about this <br />particular piece of property just north of 36 being an ideal <br />extension of the industrial business area of the City. We now <br />put a B-4 district in there and it seems to me we're on the <br />"threshold of bringing to fruition something we've talked about <br />for years. I feel, obviously, we don't need that size pipe, as <br />the gentleman suggests, for existing use and that this would be <br />a natural to p~t in at least some portion, if not all of it, <br />and put it in the tax increment district. My second is really <br />based on that assumption - that ~hat's what we're going to <br />accomplish. I guess if it develops that we can't do that and <br />that we can't redevelop the property in the way we hope here, <br />11m not sure that pipe size is justified. We might have to <br />reconsider it. But I'm assuming it's going to go forward and <br />that this would be part of the overall district and that this <br />would become part of the tax increment financing district. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: I want to reiterate that I'm going to <br />vote for this to go in the tax increment district. <br /> <br />6 <br />