2011-06-28_PWETC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. Schwartz noted the need to look at collector streets; and other policy models. Member Gjerdingen referenced the DePlaines, IL model addressing other agencies or interested parties contributing to a policy. Vice Chair Vanderwall spoke in support of the once per year deadline, allowing for more efficiencies and meshing projects together. Member Felice noted the need for other items outside normal funding realms (e.g. pedestrian bridge over Snelling Avenue) and questioned whether a"wish list" or portfolio of dream wises could be put together for future consideration as potential funding was available or as related projects developed. Mr. Schwartz advised that the City Council had discussed such a wish list, and thought it would be appropriate, while outside the realm of a neighborhood traffic policy, but similar to the Pathway Master Plan. Mr. Schwartz noted that this would allow consideration of those things as funding opportunities arose and how they would fit in various areas as they redeveloped. Vice Chair Vanderwall referenced techniques used by Kiev, Ukraine as an example for tunnels, even with winter weather considerations, rather than pedestrian bridges and the markets and other community events in those tunnels. Vice Chair Vanderwall noted the significant infrastructure cost to build them, but reminded Commissioners that looking up may not be the only way to go. Vice Chair Vanderwall advocated for his previously stated desire for a way for residents on the south side of Highway 36 to access Rosedale; and highlighted the recent results at Sienna Green Apartments in handling their storm water management, and their pride in the project, and encouraged Commissioners to review it. Ms. Bloom noted that the $70,000 sidewalk project currently being installed by the City was a part of the Sienna Green (AEON) project, through CBDG grand funds. Ms. Bloom left the meeting following this discussion. 7. Utility Capital Improvement Program Mr. Schwartz noted the City Manager and City Council's Capital Improvements Subcommittee request for the Commission's review and comment on the Public Works CIP; and review of the Subcommittee's utility rate recommendation to address infrastructure needs over the next twenty (20) years. Mr. Schwartz noted recent completion of a twenty (20) year utility capital improvement plan for tax- supported and non-tax-supported needs of the City. Mr. Schwartz advised that the City's Finance Director would be providing additional information and utility rate comparisons for the Commission's July meeting to further facility discussions. Mr. Schwartz noted the significant rate increases being suggested in the Subcommittee Report to address CIP and infrastructure needs. Page 9 of 11