My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
April 2014
ArdenHills
>
Communications
>
Arden Hills Notes Newsletter
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
April 2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 10:43:14 AM
Creation date
4/7/2014 3:51:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council rejects franchise fee proposal to fund parks, <br />trails, and road maintenance and improvements <br />by Kristine Goodrich <br />rden Hills property owners wont includes reconstruction of West Round ible for their payers as are property taxes. <br />includes reconstruction of West Round <br />see new City fees on their electric Franchise fees also are considered regres <br />- <br />and gas bills. After several months Valentine Hills neighborhood next year sive because every property type pays <br />Valentine Hills neighborhood next year <br />and participation in state bridge projects in the same amount, regardless of property <br />of discussions and two public hearings, and participation in state bridge projects in <br />2015, 2016, and 2017. There are no road value. <br />the Council unanimously opted in Febru2015, 2016, and 2017. There are no road <br />- <br />projects planned between 2018 and 2022. <br />ary not to move forward with exploring projects planned between 2018 and 2022. <br />Public makes its voice heard <br />News that reconstruction of Old Snelling <br />franchise fees. Council members said their News that reconstruction of Old Snelling <br />Avenue isnt planned until 2025 drew conAt two public hearings in February, com <br />Avenue isnt planned until 2025 drew con <br />-- <br />cern from several public hearing speakers. munity members heard presentations <br />public majority opposed the idea. cern from several public hearing speakers. <br />about the franchise fee proposal and were <br />City leaders had considered franchise The Citys Capital Improvement Plan invited to share opinions. More than 30 <br />The Citys Capital Improvement Plan <br />fees as a potential new, broader revenue proposes using money from the Permanent people spoke and many more attended the <br />proposes using money from the Permanent <br />source to support parks, trails, and road Improvement Revolving Fund for park public hearings. A few speakers, includ <br />Improvement Revolving Fund for park <br />- <br />maintenance and improvements. The ing several members of the Parks, Trails, <br />City looked at adding monthly fees on all years, including a trial dog park area in and Recreation Committee, supported the <br />years, including a trial dog park area in <br />property owners electric and gas bills. For the Hazelnut Park ice rink, and parking franchise fees as a dedicated source for <br />the Hazelnut Park ice rink, and parking <br />residents, the proposed fees totaled $4.75. lot and drainage improvements at Freeparks and trails improvements. Most of <br />lot and drainage improvements at Free <br />- <br />The fees would have varied for other way Park. No new trails are included in the speakers opposed the fees for a variety <br />way Park. No new trails are included in <br />properties. The fees would have generated of reasons. Some speakers didnt believe <br />approximately $439,000 annually for the additional capital project spending was <br />City. of new trails as high priority and has an essential. Other speakers preferred the <br />of new trails as high priority and has an <br />additional 16 miles of new trails on its City continue to utilize its tax levy author <br />additional 16 miles of new trails on its <br />- <br /> Citys reasons for considering fee <br />wish list. ity rather than create a new fee. Council <br />The franchise fees proposal was prompted members noted they also received feed <br />- <br />Pros and cons weighed <br />by Council members concern the City back via emails and other media, predomi <br />- <br />The advantages and disadvantages of nantly in opposition to the proposal. <br />The advantages and disadvantages of <br />- <br />complish priority street, park and trail assessing franchise fees instead of raising <br />assessing franchise fees instead of raising <br />projects in a timely manner. The City has the property tax levy were considered. Council members thanked community <br />the property tax levy were considered. <br />used reserve funds to help pay for recent Franchise fees would have been assessed members for sharing their opinions. While <br />Franchise fees would have been assessed <br />projects. The Park Dedication Fund has to all properties including tax exempt some Council members acknowledged <br />to all properties including tax exempt <br />properties, which account for 43 percent <br />properties, which account for 43 percent <br />dedication revenues are expected in the of the Citys market value. For most or drawbacks, all of the the Council mem <br />of the Citys market value. For most <br />- <br />near future. The Permanent Improvement homeowners, the franchise fees would bers said they dont support <br />homeowners, the franchise fees would <br />Revolving Fund has a sizable reserve that have cost less than if the City increased further consideration of the <br />have cost less than if the City increased <br />allows the City not to have to take out property taxes by a comparable amount. fees at this time because pub <br />property taxes by a comparable amount. <br />- <br />loans for major road projects. The franchise fees would also have been lic reaction to the proposal <br />The franchise fees would also have been <br />a stable revenue source, not impacted by wasnt favorable. <br />a stable revenue source, not impacted by <br />The Citys road improvement plan, based <br />on current expected funding levels, hand, franchise fees are not tax deduct <br />hand, franchise fees are not tax deduct <br />- <br />Spring Cleanup Day is May 17. See page 5 for details. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.