My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
86-020
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
86-020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 11:33:07 AM
Creation date
4/21/2014 3:17:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Resolution 86-020
General - Type
Resolution 86-020
Category
Resolution 86-020
Date
9/24/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. 86-20 <br />RESOLUTION COMBINING IMPROVEMENT NOS. SS-83-6 <br />AND W-86-2 (SANITARY SEWER INTERCEPTOR AND <br />TRUHLER ADDITION WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS) <br />WHEREAS, two years have elapsed since the City Council <br />ordered the sanitary sewer interceptor project to be installed <br />between the south shore of Round Lake and the north right-of-way <br />line of Interstate Highway No. 694, extending westward from the <br />west right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 62 (Old Highway <br />No. 10), which is identified as Improvement No. SS-83-6, and <br />WHEREAS, Improvement No. SS-83-6 has never been <br />constructed, and <br />WHEREAS, the Feasibility Report prepared by the City <br />Engineer indicates that the construction of a water main improve- <br />m�nt (Improvement No. W�86-2) in connection with the proposed <br />Truhler Addition would be feasible, and <br />WHEREAS, the City Engineer has proposed that Improvement <br />Nos. SS-83-6 and W-86-2 be constructed together, at the same <br />time, in the same excavated trench, <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA THAT Improvement Nos. SS-83-6 and <br />W-86-2 be combined for construction purposes but be separated for <br />assessment purposes--subject, however, to confirmation from the <br />City bond counsel that the two projects can be separated for <br />assessment purposes. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution <br />was duly seconded by Council member Sather and, upon vote being <br />taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: A11; and <br />�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.