Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />MINUTES OF ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF TIlE <br />VILLAGE OF ARDEN lULLS. MINNESOTA <br />Held in the Town Hall. Friday. March 23rd. 1951. <br /> <br />Pursuant to action taken by the council at its previous first meet- <br />ing, this was a joint meeting of the village council with the Town Board of <br />Mounds View Township, called for the purpose of discussing a division of funds <br />in the town treasury, and other matters. The meeting ..as called to order by <br />Wesley Chandler, as chairman of the Town Board, and by Mayor CUIIllIlings as chair- <br />man of the village council. Other members of the Town Board present were <br />Clerk Irvine L. Bucher, Treasurer Dahl Metters, Supervisors Leonard /lhite and <br />Mr. Meyers, and Melvin Hurlbert, Building Inspector. ill members <br />of the village council were present, as was Treasurer Worth G. Read. <br /> <br />en the question of who has title to the Town Hall site, Trustee Mack <br />voiced the opinion based upon a study of the record of the deed, that the legal <br />title is vested in fee in the Township of MOunds View for the pgrpose expressed <br />therein, subject to reversion to the original grantors only if living in the <br />event of a violation of the terms of the deed, and that the heirs of the grantors <br />have no reversionary rights because not mentioned in the deed. Mr. Chandler <br />suggested that either the Township buyout any interest the village may have in <br />the real property (town hall) and thereafter allow it to use the hall on a <br />rental basis to be agreed upon, or that the village buy out the town I s interest <br />and then the town rent from the village. No decision was arrived at and the <br />question is to be considered further and decided at a later brneeting. The Cal- <br />census of opinion is that the town has title and should submit a proposal to <br />rent to the village. <br /> <br />The question of an equitable division of funds now in the town <br />treasury was then taken up. Mr. Chandler stated that as of March 1, 1951 the <br />balances subject to division were as follows: <br /> <br />(a) <br />(b) <br />(c) <br />(d) <br />(e) <br /> <br />General Fund <br />Road & Bridge <br />Fire Fund <br />Building Fund <br /> <br />Fund <br /> <br />$ 3,~40.60 <br />2,174.43 <br />652.36 <br />5.823.05 <br />$11,890.44 <br /> <br />Total . . . . <br />6 $200 speed~checke, payment <br />guaranteed by drawer . . . <br /> <br />1,200.00 <br /> <br />Treasurer Metters of the Town Board mentioned that he was advised <br />by Mr. .:pears of the County Auditor's office that a fair average division of the <br />total amotU1t of the funds would be about 9-1/2% as the village' s share. This <br />is being based upon a rationof personal and real property valuations of village <br />and township. The village council fl!,vored a figure of 16%, based upon the 1950 <br />real property assessed valuations of $274,502.00 for the village, and $1,452,237.00 <br />for the township, tctal $1,726,739.00, as given in the County Auditor's letter <br />of March 14th to Clerk Doepner. The real property valuations were proposed as <br />a basis blcause of inability to arrive at any reliable personal p:'operty valua- <br />tions. The $14,700.00 personal property tax collectible in 1950 from the <br />Arms Plant was mentioned but nothing done about it. Mr. Chandler then proposed <br />