|
<br />-- -~-----~._. .
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />- __ ....--^.~---t
<br />
<br />)Jm//!lIV
<br />
<br />'"
<br />
<br />!
<br />
<br />Minutes of Rogular Counci f Meeting
<br />V~ i R!:'ge or JI..rden t"H lis
<br />~o~day= May 221 ~912
<br />Vi i lage HB! ~
<br />
<br />Ccd e ~.o Order
<br />--- .......~
<br />
<br />lh. MB~~lng .~~ called to order ~t 8:00 p.m. by Mayor Crepeau.
<br />
<br />Eo U, C" i i
<br />
<br />p~."')$Gnt ;
<br />
<br />Mayor CV"<1lP""",u, CO!.lnci !men Olmer., Hollenhorst,
<br />Henderson and HBrrl~k
<br />
<br />. Absent:,
<br />
<br />Mona
<br />
<br />A ~ so PriJsent:
<br />
<br />Clerk Administrator Lorra1ne Stromquist, Treasurar
<br />Rlch~rd O'Kelly, Attorney Vlncant P. Courtney,
<br />Engineers Donald Lund and Don Christoffersen
<br />
<br />~pro'!i1li of ~!.inutEl$
<br />
<br />The mlnutes of the R~g~Jar Coynei! meeting of May 8, 1972 were approved
<br />as I!lffionded.
<br />
<br />Case No. 7~-25
<br />
<br />Motion ~es made by Ho11enhorst, seconded by Henderson, that Council
<br />3ctlon taken p~~vlo~s!y regarding C8se No. 7!-25be 6~tended to Include
<br />ch.n~$ in situ plan as prss.ntod by Mr. Hcrry Garrish, plan dated May 22,
<br />1972 and placed on fIle; motion carried unanimously.
<br />
<br />T.~porery Mob!!o Hom~
<br />
<br />Motion was mBdm by HDI&DnhQ~~t, seconded by Herrick, thet a 6-month
<br />pcrll',!t, nf1'mctl'!(l from 1>1",'1 22, 197/, to November 22, 1972, be granted
<br />Mr. Richard Erickson, 1785 Vanus Avenue, to nllow the f.~I!y to live In
<br />& mob i la h01\116 on the 1)!"')?~ r'ty ~Ih! I", the I ..hOIlSll Is 'JIHie r cons'truet I on;
<br />motion carried 'Jnanlmev,s!y. Signatures or niilllrby neighbors approYlng
<br />the request WBS pieced on file.
<br />
<br />C<lSEl No. 71-2 ~. ~2i1 ~l11ror
<br />
<br />Attorney Copeland, ~3pr81.ntlng Mr. ~nd Mrs. James ^d~m., !".ported th~t
<br />an agreement he. be.n reached wi~h tho Klaldons regarding slIe of their
<br />property. A copy of the contract far de8d was submitted by Mr. Copeland
<br />to V;iiage Attor~ev Courtneyo
<br />
<br />The .loulo~!!n!i items wlH'e dl"cussod regarding the Arden 'laner project;
<br />
<br />.La n d S CI>.:.l!!.9.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />\II 1 1 a 9<' P~llnner Utt!av's report, darlJjd (JollY ~8, 1972, 511ggested
<br />agt.r~tIDn5 to th. londscape plan Bnd rBcom.ended a landsclpo bond
<br />of 174,000. Mr. Adami fe~t the landscaping could be done for about
<br />$IB;OOO. Ha WI5 moked ta get a written bJdand submit to VIllage
<br />Engineer to chock and report tD the Council. .
<br />
<br />Attorney Courtney was asked to determine whether Dr not an oscrow
<br />dep,o,;;!t is accoptl":ble in QI~"J fjr .1 ~i.mdsCilP0 pe,-formance bend, Ilnd
<br />to teke Into consideratIon comments on the matt.r made by Engineer
<br />Lund. Ths COlwell agL~.ad i-IH,t the bOi"1d or escrow deposit wou~d be
<br />~"$tluc,Bd os tho ,-; i~'Hj,~s-t-ap j 09 fH",t'lg:T~:"ssec.le
<br />
<br />~eclal Use ['orinlt - Sta~lIncL.& Perf<!!,.!!,~~ond
<br />
<br />VI! lags PlannEll' Uttley's report, da';-ed [,jay 18, 1972', was reviewed.
<br />Attorney Cauriney was ~sked to draw up a spuc!al use permit within
<br />the next 2 '<HUlk period, If ai 1 '~he necess..ry material is submitted
<br />to him:
<br />
<br />(i) A:"'cle:rt r~ltH1CU"" p~ens ~H'.'{; to show \'1hat is to be built
<br />ol'l?ne p.....:lJect In ! 972 Uill! 111 ! 973.
<br />
|