Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br /> <br />March 30, 1~8'J. .;' <br /> <br />2. How to best get complaints to RCWD? <br /> <br />Harstad said that a letter is probably the best way to <br />introduce the complaint; probably followed by personal <br />appearance. <br /> <br />3. Apparent lack of communication between RCWD and the <br />Village. <br /> <br />It was explained that the method of emptying the low- <br />lands in the area of County Rd. E2 was changed by <br />RCWD, without notification to the city; this change <br />put city sewer in danger of flooding; now RCWD is <br />asking the city to pay for correcting the RCWD's <br />changE\! plan. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />In discussion of RCWD's long range program to improve water quality, <br />Council suggested that consideration be given to: <br /> <br />1. Changing the drainage into the lakes. <br />2. Controlling the level of the lakes; lowering the <br />level in the fall to prevent flood damage in the <br />spring; suggested a dam to raise or lower the level. <br /> <br />Council asked if Round Lake is in the purview of RCWD's regulations; <br />advised that the lake level is being lowered by the Dept. of Wild- <br />life and Fisheries; noted that the aesthetics of this lake are <br />important to the residents, the city and possibly to RCWD as well. <br /> <br />Crichton thanked Manager Harstad for listening to Council's con- <br />cerns, which Harstad said she would relay to the Board of Managers. <br /> <br />County Road E. Improvement - NSP Agreement <br />McNiesh reported that all the easements have not been received to <br />date; therefore the NSP Agreement cannot be executed as worded. <br />McNiesh suggested that Council may wish to consider re-wording <br />the agreement to state that "Arden lIi1ls will acquire all ease- <br />ments" . <br /> <br />After discussion, Woodburn moved, seconded by Hollenhorst, that <br />Council approve execution of the NSP agreement, as written, sub- <br />ject to receiving all easements prior to April 1st; recognizing <br />the fact that, without the easements, Council cannot sign the <br />agreement. Motion carried (Woodburn, Holl'enhorst, Johnson, <br />Crichton voting in favor of the motion; McAllister voting in <br />opposition.) <br /> <br />It was Council's intent to go ahead with the project, if it can. <br /> <br />Bid Award - Water Tower Painting <br />Christoffersen referred Council to Bid Tabulation of 6 bids received; <br />noted that the apparent low bidder is Allied painting and Reno- <br />vating at $17,300.00. <br /> <br />Christoffersen recommended that Council defer awarding the bid, <br />pending his investigation of the bidder's request to change the <br />type of paint and method of application. Christoffersen advised <br />that this request probably does not impact other bids received <br />because the bid price will be the same for either of the alter- <br />nates (as per specs or alternate proposed). <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Award of Bid was deferred to the April 13th meeting. <br />Christoffersen reported that painting of the stand pipe was not <br />included in the specifications; advised that the stand pipe should <br />be painted; change order may be needed to include painting the <br />stand pipe. <br /> <br />Payroll <br />Hollenhorst moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council approve <br />the Payroll as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />-2- <br />