Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of Special Council Meeting <br />Village of Arden Hills <br />Tueaday, January 13, 1981 - 7:30 a.m. <br />MSI Cafeteria <br /> <br />Call to Order <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Crichton called <br />the meeting to order at 7:50 a.m. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Present - <br /> <br />Mayor Charlie Crichton, Councilmen Janet Hollenhorst, <br />Diane McAllister, Robert Woodburn. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Abaell t - <br /> <br />Councilman Maurice Johnson <br /> <br />Also Present - Ellgilleer Donald Christoffersen, Planner Orlyn Miller, <br />CIerkAdmillistrator Charlotte McNiesh, Dan Bucholz <br />and County Road E businesamen. <br /> <br />The purpose of this special meeting with area businessmen waa to <br />discuss the proposed County Road E Improvement, update eatimated <br />costa, etc. <br /> <br />Christoffersen reported that the NSP eatimate for under8round linss <br />is 1l0W $274,601 a reduction of $83,499 and that NSP would enter <br />into an agreement on method of paymellt i.e. 50% prior to construc- <br />tion, balance 60 days followin8 completion of project. He also re- <br />ported thst the Village has requested Ramsey County to aasist in <br />the funding of the islands from County State Aid for Streets and <br />the pedestrian bikeway from State Bikeway funds. The legal descrip- <br />tions for -the easements necessary for burying the electric/telephone <br />cable alldfor walkway have been sent to the Village Attorlley. <br />Easemellts will be 20 ft. wide on south side and 8enerally 10 ft. <br />wide on the north, except for Flahertys and St. Paul Book which will <br />be 20 ft. Street lights are sited 100 ft. apart alternately (200 <br />ft. betweell lights on each aide of street). <br /> <br />Financing Project <br />The feasibility report states that the assessable frontage along <br />County Rd. E is approximately 4,000 feet, original cost eatimate <br />of $538,500 results in a cost of $135/ft. if 100% assessed against <br />abutting frontage. NSP's current estimate would reduce the total <br />cost to about $455,000 or $114/ft. <br /> <br />Roger Hauck, MSI, said the business community wants the interim <br />deaign including buried utilities or nothillg and request 50% of <br />coat to be on general taxes. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It was noted that the assessment formulas (percent on general <br />taxes, front foot assesament and/or area assessmenta, number of <br />years over which payment is spread) are determined at the assess- <br />mellt hearing. <br /> <br />Crichton stated he wants to do the right thing, has feit that costs <br />of burying the cable should be assessed to benefitted property <br />owne ra . <br /> <br />Woodburn ~tated he felt Council was committed to 50% sharing and <br />noted that property owners would have added expense for buryillg <br />the cable to their buildings. <br /> <br />McAllister stated that she was opposed to City aharillg in the cost <br />of buryillg utilities. <br /> <br />Patrick Flaherty said that easements being granted at no cost repre- <br />sents a substantial dollar contribution. <br /> <br />Planner Miller noted that easements won't affect development of <br />properties becauae easements are within setback requirementa. <br />