Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> COUNTY OF ANOKA <br /> CITY OF CENTERVILLE <br /> RES. #15-008 <br /> A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE PROFFERED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY <br /> THE WHITE BEAR LAKE RESTORATION ASSOCIATION RELATING TO <br /> REGIONALIZATION OF MUNICIPAL DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES <br /> WHEREAS, the White Bear Lake Restoration Association, launched a lawsuit against the <br /> Minnesota Department of Resources (DNR) asserting complaints about the water level in White <br /> Bear Lake and claiming that the DNR violated the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA) <br /> and the Public Trust Doctrine among other allegations; and <br /> WHEREAS, the lawsuit contained claims, propounded by the Plaintiffs hired representatives, <br /> which asserted that by allowing thirteen local communities to use groundwater for their public water <br /> supply, including primarily drinking water, the DNR permitted too much groundwater to be used. <br /> This, the lawsuit claimed, affected recreational uses in White Bear Lake. Plaintiffs, and their hired <br /> representatives, thus demanded constriction of groundwater uses by neighboring Cities including <br /> suggesting in their written discovery responses that municipal water wells be terminated (in a <br /> manner to be determined by the DNR) because, claimed the Plaintiff s representatives, pumping of <br /> municipal drinking water resulted in a recent decline in water levels of White Bear Lake; and <br /> WHEREAS, DNR denied those allegations and responded by pointing out that the claimed recent <br /> reduction in water levels in White Bear Lake was <br /> • a cyclical decline which occurs at varying years over the long existence of the lake and then <br /> reverses; and <br /> • that it was related to climate patterns; and <br /> • that it was also (and more obviously) related to cessation of a long-standing practice of <br /> directly pumping water into the lake to maintain its levels; and <br /> • that, despite the claims of Plaintiffs paid experts, even independent studies were <br /> preliminary and did not plainly establish a link between drinking water pumping and the <br /> depth of water in White Bear Lake and that additional study and consideration was needed <br /> to understand this complex inquiry; and <br /> • that, ultimately, the entire matter was a complex inquiry, more aptly suited to be explored <br /> and resolved by dispassionate scientific inquiry, rather than to be determined by the claims <br /> of Plaintiff s paid advocates through lawsuits; and <br /> WHEREAS, well before the lawsuit, the City of Centerville encouraged and developed <br /> mechanisms for recapturing and conserving surface water and surface water runoff for use to <br /> replace or supplement ground water use;and <br /> WHEREAS, though the City of Centerville encouraged the DNR to contest the Plaintiffs claims <br /> vigorously,Plaintiffs and the DNR have agreed to a settlement which, among other things: <br />