Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the <br />City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota <br />was duly held on the 23rd day of November, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Kehr, Johnson, Cushman, Matson, <br />and Wiski, and the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />Member Matson introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 8222 <br /> <br />SUPPORTING A PROPOSAL TO THE <br />MINNESOTA AMATEUR SPORTS COMMISSION FOR <br />CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A SPEEDSKATING FACILITY <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville is desirable of having a State of <br />Minnesota designated Speedskating/Bandy/Multi-Use Facility located in <br />Roseville: and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville believes a covered facility should be <br />constructed and funded by the State of Minnesota: and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville believes the City should be assured of <br />a non-property tax revenue source to finance operations either from <br />the State or from State enabling legislation permitting a hospitality <br />taxi and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville is agreeable to assuming operational <br />responsibility for the facility; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roseville City Council fully <br />supports the proposal to the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission for <br />the construction and operation of a Speedskating/Bandy/Multi-Use <br />Facility in Rosevillei and <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution and a copy of <br />the proposal be forwarded to the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission <br />and the Roseville Legislative Delegation. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly <br />seconded by Member Johnson and upon a vote being taken thereon, <br />the following voted in favor thereof: Kehr, Johnson, Cushman, <br />Matson, and Wiski, and the following voted against the same: <br />None. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />